Barriers and Coping Mechanisms Relating to Agroforestry Adoption by Smallholder Farmers in Zimbabwe

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to investigate agroforestry adoption by smallholder farmers in Gutu District, Zimbabwe. Design/methodology/Approach: The methodology was based on field data collected through household questionnaires, key informant interviews and direct observations. Findings: Major findings reveal that traditional agroforestry was common in the study area. There were no cases of innovative agroforestry other than dwindling remnants from a former trees-with-pasture project. Majority of respondents were willing to adopt innovative agroforestry technologies to improve yields and income. Damage and destruction of plants by pests and animals due to lack of fences emerged as the major challenges to the adoption of agroforestry. Other challenges included seed availability and labour requirements. Possible coping strategies, identified through consulting farmers and other stakeholders, would include local initiatives and support from outside the community. Local and external efforts are required especially to secure inputs and raise awareness, knowledge and skills with respect to specific agroforestry technologies. Practical Implications: The paper presents pointers on the involvement of women in agroforestry and on the cultural significance of indigenous and exotic fruit trees. It provides practical lessons useful to extension or rural development workers in a localised set-up. Originality/Value: The case study gives an insight into the problems faced by peasant farmers and the requirements to make agroforestry successful. Practitioners in southern Africa could learn a great deal about issues relating to smallholder farmers from reading this paper.

Identifying Climate-smart agriculture research needs

“…CSA implementation also faces a better understanding of the capacity of extension services or consultants in each country to help training farmers on climate-smart practices. It is well-known that innovative technologies (e.g., agroforestry) require specific extension support, sometimes not readily available (Chitakira and Torquebiau, 2010). A better understanding of farmers' views and actions on CSA practices is also required.…”

Biodiversity Conservation Through Farming: A Landscape Assessment in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

“…Experience has shown that extension for innovative practices (e.g. agroforestry) requires skilled extension officers (Chitakira and Torquebiau 2010). Local organisations such as NGOs and other agencies may greatly help in making the landscape keep (or change towards better) conservation of natural resources together with food production.…”

Improved Policies for Facilitating the Adoption of Agroforestry

“…in Zimbabwe - Chitakira and Torquebiau, 2010;in Nigeria -Banful et al, 2010;in Zambia-Sturmheit, 1990). This creates an information bias towards other types of practices.…”