Barriers and Drivers for Mainstreaming Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Risks: The Case of South Korea

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NBS) are seen as a promising adaptation measure that sustainably deals with diverse societal challenges, while simultaneously delivering multiple benefits. Nature-based solutions have been highlighted as a resilient and sustainable means of mitigating floods and other hazards globally. This study examined diverging conceptualizations of NBS, as well as the attitudinal (for example, emotions and beliefs) and contextual (for example, legal and political aspects) barriers and drivers of NBS for flood risks in South Korea. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 experts and focused on the topic of flood risk measures and NBS case studies. The analysis found 11 barriers and five drivers in the attitudinal domain, and 13 barriers and two drivers in the contextual domain. Most experts see direct monetary benefits as an important attitudinal factor for the public. Meanwhile, the cost-effectiveness of NBS and their capacity to cope with flood risks were deemed influential factors that could lead decision makers to opt for NBS. Among the contextual factors, insufficient systems to integrate NBS in practice and the ideologicalization of NBS policy were found to be peculiar barriers, which hinder consistent realization of initiatives and a long-term national plan for NBS. Understanding the barriers and drivers related to the mainstreaming of NBS is critical if we are to make the most of such solutions for society and nature. It is also essential that we have a shared definition, expectation, and vision of NBS.

Harnessing nature-based solutions for health in post-COVID era: a narrative review

“…Lack of public awareness and knowledge discrepancy regarding naturebased health is also an important barrier. 38 IUCN's nature 2030 programme calls for equitable distribution of naturebased solutions for all. Notwithstanding these barriers, it remains an evidence-based fact that nature has been playing a harmonious role in the world of health, creating a connection between individual and the environment.…”

Unravelling stakeholder narratives on nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction

“…This phenomenon is particularly likely if coalition-building efforts with sceptics focus on adopting their solutions without addressing their underlying fears and concerns. Such an approach may lead to an increase in hybrid solutions that combine green and grey measures, potentially opening the door for accusations of NBS as a green-washing vehicle (Anderson et al, 2022;Han and Kuhlicke, 2021).…”

A place‐based risk appraisal model for exploring residents’ attitudes toward nature‐based solutions to flood risks

“…Other studies have shown that policymakers as well as practitioners also tend to underestimate the efficacy of NBS. For example, policymakers and practitioners have more reliance on technical measures than nature‐based solutions compared to the people in academia from their interviews (Han & Kuhlicke, 2021; Wolf et al., 2021). In cases where flood risks were considered to be high or where a locality has experienced severe flooding in the past, technical measures were preferred by the policymakers (Brillinger, Dehnhardt, Schwarze, & Albert, 2020).…”