Barriers and enablers to caregivers' responsive feeding behaviour: A systematic review to inform childhood obesity prevention

Abstract

Summary Responsive infant feeding is a critical component of childhood obesity prevention. However, there is little guidance for caregivers on how to do this successfully. The first step to developing an intervention to promote responsive feeding is to systematically identify its barriers and enablers. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Maternity, and Infant Care from inception to November 2020. All study designs were included if they reported a barrier or enabler to responsive feeding during the first 2 years of life. We used a “best fit” framework synthesis, with the Capacity, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behaviour (COM‐B) model. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess study quality. Forty‐three studies were included in the review. Barriers (n = 36) and enablers (n = 21) were identified across five COM‐B domains: psychological capacity, physical and social opportunity, and reflective and automatic motivation. Enablers were recognition of infant feeding cues, feeding knowledge and family and friends. Caregiver attitude toward control of feeding was a barrier, together with health care professional advice about formula feeding and breastfeeding expectation. These barriers and enablers provide a comprehensive evidence base to guide intervention development to improve responsive feeding and prevent obesity across individual and population levels.

Responsive Feeding Recommendations: Harmonizing Integration into Dietary Guidelines for Infants and Young Children

“… Responsive feeding framework. Original framework supported with evidence from Bentley et al ( 7 ); Black and Aboud ( 8 ); National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine ( 15 ); Pérez-Escamilla et al ( 2 ); Redsell et al ( 16 ); and Pérez-Escamilla et al( 1 , 2 ) …”

Baby‐led weaning: A thematic analysis of comments made by parents using online parenting forums

“…Although a study in New Zealand found that babies following a modified version of BLW had lower satiety responsiveness than a control group, two later observational studies have demonstrated increased satiety responsiveness amongst infants following self-reported BLW, compared to a group following TW. 12,[31][32][33] A further study reported that fully formulafed infants, who were later spoon-fed, were more likely to be overweight than breastfed infants or formula fed infants following BLW. 34 BLW may, therefore, be most beneficial for formula fed infants.…”

Timing of WIC Enrollment and Responsive Feeding among Low-Income Women in the US

“…However, no identified studies have evaluated the effectiveness of WIC’s responsive feeding education on feeding outcomes. Even so, a recent review found that responsive feeding skills, knowledge and understanding of feeding and appetite, and education that supports responsive feeding are key enablers of responsive feeding [ 26 ]. In addition, early and repeated exposure to new skills or concepts improve learning outcomes [ 27 , 28 , 29 ].…”