Barriers and facilitators to conducting economic evaluation studies of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: a survey of researchers

Abstract

Background The number of published economic evaluations of Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries is notably scarce. Limited local evidence could have a major impact on the implementation of economic evaluation recommendations in the decision-making process in GCC countries. Little is known about the factors affecting researchers who seek to conduct economic evaluations. Therefore, we aimed to assess researcher barriers and facilitators in conducting such studies of GCC countries. Methods A cross-sectional survey of health economic researchers working in GCC countries was conducted online between January and February 2020. The survey instrument collected researchers’ perceived barriers and facilitators and demographic information. For barriers, respondents rated their agreement on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”. For facilitators, respondents rated the importance of each facilitator on a six-point scale ranging from “extremely important” to “not very important”. Then, participants were asked to select the three most important barriers and facilitators from the lists. The data collected were examined using descriptive analysis. Results Fifty-one researchers completed the survey (37% response rate). The majority of participants (more than 80%) agreed that lack of quality of effectiveness data and restricted access to unit cost data are the main barriers to conducting economic research. Availability of relevant local data was reported as an important facilitator, followed by collaboration between health economic researchers, policy-makers and other stakeholders. Conclusions The results of this study provide an exploratory view of the issues faced by health economics researchers in GCC countries. Recommendations to GCC countries based on international experiences, such as to use real-world data in economic evaluation research, were provided.

Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions

“…Furthermore, barriers to conducting economic evaluations still exist in this region. These barriers have been discussed elsewhere in previous studies [ 6 , 18 , 19 , 84 – 86 ].…”

Barriers and Facilitators of Pharmacoeconomic Studies: A Review of Evidence from the Middle Eastern Countries

“…Arrangement of such workshops and seminars on local and national levels greatly helps boost knowledge of pharmacoeconomics among students and researchers. It brings about new ideas and ways to bring innovation to the healthcare system by implementing pharmacoeconomic tools and making full use of financial resources and budget management by creating a balance between drug costs and results [42].…”

“…Almazrou et al reported that researchers face difficulty using pharmacoeconomic tools due to a lack of expertise on evaluation outcomes such as QALYs. Furthermore, there is no national governing body solely dedicated to implementing pharmacoeconomics at the local and national levels [42].…”

“…This is highly important because the availability of high-quality medication data is the biggest facilitator of the implementation of phar-macoeconomics. Governments should establish minimum data set requirements and form committees that evaluate medical records and data sets and hold the authorities responsible for poor health records [42].…”

The Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) and the Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ): Translation and Cognitive Debriefing of the Arabic Version

“…Despite the growing interest in the role of economic evaluation in the decision-making process in Arab countries, the published literature is limited in quality and quantity [7,8]. The availability of cost and effectiveness data has been reported as the main barrier to conducting economic evaluation by researchers in the region [9].…”