2020
DOI: 10.1080/09362835.2020.1727335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of BEST in CLASS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found evidence of moderation by study quality indices, which predicted significant mean differences in student externalizing behaviors. However, this finding warrants much deeper analyses as it remains unclear to what degree quality of implementation impacted the effectiveness USB SEL interventions due to the lack of data (Domitrovich et al, 2019; Granger et al, 2020; Sutherland & McLeod, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found evidence of moderation by study quality indices, which predicted significant mean differences in student externalizing behaviors. However, this finding warrants much deeper analyses as it remains unclear to what degree quality of implementation impacted the effectiveness USB SEL interventions due to the lack of data (Domitrovich et al, 2019; Granger et al, 2020; Sutherland & McLeod, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Program implementation Durlak et al (2011) found that programs that monitored implementation (i.e., fidelity) were more effective than those that did not. Most measures of implementation consider fidelity, or the extent to which the program was implemented as intended (e.g., lessons were delivered, core principles were implemented) and there is growing evidence supporting the important roles of implementation fidelity and implementation quality (Domitrovich et al, 2019;Granger et al, 2020;Low et al, 2016;Sutherland & McLeod, 2022). Given the substantial growth and focus on implementation, a contemporary meta-analysis is well suited to identify the role of monitoring other aspects of quality implementation, beyond fidelity, that have been associated with improved outcomes, such as the dosage delivered, quality of program delivery, or participant engagement (Low et al, 2016).…”
Section: From "What" To "How": Advances In Usb Sel Implementation Sci...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We maintained these interventions in our analysis and found evidence of moderation by study quality indices, which predicted significant mean differences in student externalizing behaviors. data (Domitrovich et al, 2019;Granger et al, 2020;Sutherland & McLeod, 2021). This issue is not new, it was previously reported that nearly half of studies did not monitor implementation.…”
Section: Challenges and Opportunities For Social And Emotional Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durlak et al (2011) found that programs that monitored implementation (i.e., fidelity) were more effective than those that did not. Most measures of implementation consider fidelity, or the extent to which the program was implemented as intended (e.g., lessons were delivered, core principles were implemented) and there is growing evidence supporting the important roles of implementation fidelity and implementation quality (Domitrovich et al, 2019;Granger et al, 2020;Low et al, 2016;Sutherland & McLeod, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De igual forma, si bien un número importante de programas para el ASE que han sido prediseñados muestran una alta efectividad en su implementación (Aidman y Price, 2018;Capp et al, 2018;Fox et al, 2021;Granger et al, 2020;Mira-Galvañ y Gilar-Cobi, 2020;Mira-Galvañ y Gilar-Cobi, 2021;Ohrt et al, 2020;Usakli, 2018), Valarezo et al (2022) destacan la importancia de que estos programas se hayan diseñado para el contexto específico donde se han de implementar, con base en un diagnóstico previo de necesidades y con la implicación de toda la comunidad educativa.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified