2017
DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Health Service Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Comparative Health Systems and Service Analysis

Abstract: This systematic review synthesizes 11 studies of health‐sector responses to intimate partner violence (IPV) in low‐ and middle‐income countries. The services that were most comprehensive and integrated in their responsiveness to IPV were primarily in primary health and antenatal care settings. Findings suggest that the following facilitators are important: availability of clear guidelines, policies, or protocols; management support; intersectoral coordination with clear, accessible on‐site and off‐site referra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
80
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(223 reference statements)
2
80
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, persistent exposure to torturous and violent behavior by an intimate partner can force a woman to escape from home, resulting in homelessness, economic insecurity, and substance abuse [8][9][10][11], which themselves are strong risk factors for abduction, harassment, sexual assault, and socioeconomic marginalization. As such, IPV can have serious repercussions on women's livelihood and economic security, safety, health, and overall well-being [12][13][14][15]. Despite this, there is currently no research evidence on IPV in many countries in SSA, including Angola.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intuitively, persistent exposure to torturous and violent behavior by an intimate partner can force a woman to escape from home, resulting in homelessness, economic insecurity, and substance abuse [8][9][10][11], which themselves are strong risk factors for abduction, harassment, sexual assault, and socioeconomic marginalization. As such, IPV can have serious repercussions on women's livelihood and economic security, safety, health, and overall well-being [12][13][14][15]. Despite this, there is currently no research evidence on IPV in many countries in SSA, including Angola.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of guidelines at care services locations can be linked not only to poor political leadership but also to the government's lack of prioritisation of this public health and judicial problem. These figures can probably impact on the lack of government investment compromising implementation, monitoring and evaluation of national strategies [28,29,32,33].…”
Section: Documents Alignment With National Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of this material has been designed to target assistance or prevention activities, often undermining the multisectoral approach. Conversely, it makes the strategies of prevention and control of DV institutionalised, questioning the rationalisation of resource use [15,32,[36][37][38].…”
Section: Documents Alignment With National Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is currently insufficient evidence to show that screening increases referrals to DVA support agencies, reduces violence or improves health outcomes [35,36] . These mixed findings reflect multiple barriers in identifying and responding to IPV in healthcare settings [34,37] . Whilst healthcare professionals believe IPV to be a healthcare issue, they are often reluctant to ask about abuse [38][39][40] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%