Barriers and opportunities in assessing calls to emergency medical communication centre - a qualitative study

Abstract

IntroductionPrevious studies have described the difficulties and the complexity of assessing an emergency call, and assessment protocols intended to support the emergency medical dispatcher’s (EMD) assessment have been developed and evaluated in recent years. At present, the EMD identifies about 50-70 % of patients suffering from cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction or stroke. The previous research has primarily been focused on specific conditions, and it is still unclear whether there are any overall factors that may influence the assessment of the call to the emergency medical communication centre (EMCC).AimThe aim of the study was to identify overall factors influencing the registered nurses’ (RNs) assessment of calls to the EMCC.MethodA qualitative study design was used; a purposeful selection of calls to the EMCC was analysed by content analysis.ResultsOne hundred calls to the EMCC were analysed. Barriers and opportunities related to the RN or the caller were identified as the main factors influencing the RN’s assessment of calls to the EMCC. The opportunities appeared in the callers’ symptom description and the communication strategies used by the RN. The barriers appeared in callers’ descriptions of unclear symptoms, paradoxes and the RN’s lack of communication strategies during the call.ConclusionBarriers in assessing the call to the EMCC were associated with contradictory information, the absence of a primary problem, or the structure of the call. Opportunities were associated with a clear symptom description that was also repeated, and the RN’s use of different communication strategies such as closed loop communication.

The Need for More Prehospital Research on Language Barriers: A Narrative Review

“…Dispatchers in this study had a large proportion of calls with language barriers, but dispatchers specifically indicated that language barriers were not a barrier to effective dispatch and interpreter services were not used. 25 Another review of calls with language barriers, as compared to matched language-concordant calls, found longer dispatch times with much of the difference in dispatch times attributable to connecting to the telephonic interpreter service. However, the subset of calls with language barriers in which telephonic interpretation was used was not analyzed to measure whether use of telephonic interpreters was associated with more accurate dispatch.…”

Influence of social characteristics on use of paediatric emergency care in Sweden - a questionnaire based study

“…In agreement with our findings, linguistic barriers to communication among Danish [31] and American [32, 33] immigrants have been found to be associated with less use of prehospital services for medical advice or assistance, particularly by telephone. Accordingly, the use of telephone healthline by non-native inhabitants in Sweden has been claimed to complicate medical decision-making [34], and multilingual telephone operator services have been proposed to meet this challenge [32]. Communication problems and lack of confidence have also been reported as major healthcare obstacles by non-native parents in Sweden [35].…”

Factors facilitating or hampering nurses identification of stroke in emergency calls

“…, Lindstrom et al . ) indicating that the findings most likely could be applied in other settings even internationally.…”