Barriers in Providing Psychosocial Support for Patients With Cancer

Abstract

There is sound evidence to support the notion that the provision of effective psychosocial care improves the outcomes of patients with cancer. Central to the implementation of this care is that health professionals have the necessary communication and assessment skills. This study aimed to identify key issues related to providing effective psychosocial care for adult patients admitted with hematological cancer, as perceived by registered nurses with 3 or more years of clinical experience. An exploratory qualitative design was used for this study. Two focus group interviews were conducted with 15 experienced cancer nurses. The provision of psychosocial care for patients with cancer is a dynamic process that has a professional and personal impact on the nurse. The 5 analytic themes to emerge from the data were as follows: When is it a good time to talk? Building relationships; Being drawn into the emotional world; Providing support throughout the patient's journey; and Breakdown in communication processes. The findings from this study indicate an urgent need to develop a framework to provide nurses with both skill development and ongoing support in order to improve nurses' ability to integrate psychosocial aspects of care and optimize patient outcomes.

Finding a way forward: A literature review on the current debates around clinical supervision

“…The quantitative research reviewed often evaluated the implementation of clinical supervision structures and facilitate refl ective practice (Botti et al, 2006;Kenny, Endacott, Botti, & Watts, 2007;Turner et al, 2007;Watts, Botti, & Hunter, 2010). There are a plethora of clinical supervision models within the nursing literature but few of them are well defi ned (Buus & Gonge, 2009;Fowler, 1996;Sloan, White, & Coit, 2000).…”

Examining the introduction of a supportive care screening and referral process for cancer patients: how does practice compare with protocols?

“…However, screening is merely the first step in a comprehensive process; it needs to be accompanied by evidence-based action. Whilst the literature on cancer supportive care reports on many aspects of screening for unmet needs [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], the next stepaddressing these needs-is less frequently researched and reported [12][13][14][15]. In response to these issues, the researchers developed a Supportive Care Resource Kit [16] as a resource for clinicians to enable a systematic process of screening cancer patients for unmet supportive care needs and addressing these needs by using evidence-based protocols.…”

Legalizing physician-assisted suicide and/or euthanasia: Pragmatic implications

“…Skills in addressing the emotional, information, and support needs of patients are also lacking (Botti et al, 2006;Dilworth et al, 2014). What skills would be required in the context of EAS?…”