2021
DOI: 10.3390/ph14030283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to Biosimilar Prescribing Incentives in the Context of Clinical Governance in Spain

Abstract: Incentives contribute to the proper functioning of the broader contracts that regulate the relationships between health systems and professionals. Likewise, incentives are an important element of clinical governance understood as health services’ management at the micro-level, aimed at achieving better health outcomes for patients. In Spain, monetary and non-monetary incentives are sometimes used in the health services, but not as frequently as in other countries. There are already several examples in European… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each country within the European Union (EU) has its own healthcare system. Therefore, countries with low biosimilar uptake have their own specific reasons for this ( Ingrasciotta et al, 2015 ; Remuzat et al, 2017 ; Moorkens et al, 2019 , 2020a ; Lobo and Río-Álvarez, 2021 ; Van Wilder, 2021 ). However, general elements seem to be the lack of prescribers’ incentives, limited guidance and position of regulatory authorities about transitioning to biosimilars, the innovator’s reach, and the limited understanding of biosimilars among healthcare providers (HCP) and patients ( Moorkens et al, 2016 ; Remuzat et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each country within the European Union (EU) has its own healthcare system. Therefore, countries with low biosimilar uptake have their own specific reasons for this ( Ingrasciotta et al, 2015 ; Remuzat et al, 2017 ; Moorkens et al, 2019 , 2020a ; Lobo and Río-Álvarez, 2021 ; Van Wilder, 2021 ). However, general elements seem to be the lack of prescribers’ incentives, limited guidance and position of regulatory authorities about transitioning to biosimilars, the innovator’s reach, and the limited understanding of biosimilars among healthcare providers (HCP) and patients ( Moorkens et al, 2016 ; Remuzat et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant barrier to the uptake of biosimilar medicines is misinformation and mistrust from patients and health-care professionals. 32 Patients’ preferences regarding switching remain important but are often not considered fully. The available data indicate that some RA patients may be more susceptible to nocebo effects, especially in patients with non-medical switching, suggesting that knowledge of a switch to a biosimilar product may have affected treatment efficacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared decision-making processes between RA patients and their clinicians are associated with good disease response, increased biosimilars’ acceptance, and reducing the nocebo effect. 32 , 39 , 75 , 80 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…European researchers concluded that physicians informed through official and reliable sources tend to view biosimilars positively and are more willing to improve their knowledge about biosimilars. Likewise, those who partook in a shared savings system with better-aligned reimbursements were more likely to adopt biosimilars and change their prescription patterns [28]. Hence, recognizing their effort through incentives and other forms of shared benefits encourages long-term commitments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%