2014
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to breast cancer screening in Australia: experiences of women with physical disabilities

Abstract: By exploring experiences of women with physical disabilities of breast cancer screening, nurses and other health-care professionals can use this to develop and implement optimal approaches, such as collaborative models of care which empower women with disabilities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the significant clinical experience of participants this would seem to indicate that perhaps all individuals with a disability were not recognised as having a disability. However, this finding resonates with previous literature that highlights that many health care professionals have a limited understanding of disability and the needs of those with a disability (Angus et al, 2012;Peters, 2012;Peters & Cotton, 2015). This finding is significant as a lack of knowledge about disability, and consequently nurses' failure to recognise the needs of women with a disability, provides considerable barriers for women with a disability in accessing preventive health services such as gynaecological health screening (Angus et al, 2012;Diab & Johnston, 2004;Peters & Cotton, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the significant clinical experience of participants this would seem to indicate that perhaps all individuals with a disability were not recognised as having a disability. However, this finding resonates with previous literature that highlights that many health care professionals have a limited understanding of disability and the needs of those with a disability (Angus et al, 2012;Peters, 2012;Peters & Cotton, 2015). This finding is significant as a lack of knowledge about disability, and consequently nurses' failure to recognise the needs of women with a disability, provides considerable barriers for women with a disability in accessing preventive health services such as gynaecological health screening (Angus et al, 2012;Diab & Johnston, 2004;Peters & Cotton, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, this finding resonates with previous literature that highlights that many health care professionals have a limited understanding of disability and the needs of those with a disability (Angus et al, 2012;Peters, 2012;Peters & Cotton, 2015). This finding is significant as a lack of knowledge about disability, and consequently nurses' failure to recognise the needs of women with a disability, provides considerable barriers for women with a disability in accessing preventive health services such as gynaecological health screening (Angus et al, 2012;Diab & Johnston, 2004;Peters & Cotton, 2015). General practice nurses' understanding of the importance of addressing the specific needs of women with a disability, in relation to screening, can be the first step to fostering engagement with this group and improving screening rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Several studies have evidenced how people with disabilities experience compromised access to cancer screening services. [31][32][33][34] People with disabilities face structural, financial and cultural/attitudinal barriers when they seek to access healthcare. 35 Difficulties in accessing healthcare can be caused by lack of transport, inaccessible buildings, and inadequate training of healthcare professionals, among other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3, 26] The existence of such barriers can lead to a negative cancer screening experience, which might prevent disabled women from accessing preventive health services even if they are available. [4, 28]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%