2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijpom.2016.076387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to client-contractor communication: implementing process innovation in a building project in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second contribution to theory is derived from the identification of the constraints (or 'barriers') on decommissioning projects identified by interviewees. These are a useful addition to considerations of using project management approaches in different project environments such as those identified by (Haji-kazemi et al 2015) (Terlizzi et al 2016) (Engström & Stehn 2016) in other sectors.…”
Section: Contributions To Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second contribution to theory is derived from the identification of the constraints (or 'barriers') on decommissioning projects identified by interviewees. These are a useful addition to considerations of using project management approaches in different project environments such as those identified by (Haji-kazemi et al 2015) (Terlizzi et al 2016) (Engström & Stehn 2016) in other sectors.…”
Section: Contributions To Theory and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also argued that the client must be organizationally ready for process innovation, especially when the innovation development and benefits stretch beyond the single project, e.g. throughout a system (Kulatunga et al 2011, Engstr€ om andStehn 2016). Additionally, the client's procurement strategies can serve to enhance the relationships and knowledge sharing to support innovation (Briscoe et al 2004, Eriksson 2013, Lindgren 2016.…”
Section: Context For Construction Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction logistics has largely been seen as a contractor issue, in both research and practice, however, here it becomes apparent that to coordinate construction logistics from a system perspective, the developer becomes a key player. In studies of construction innovation, the developer is often pointed out as the appropriate actor for taking an innovation supporter role (Kulatunga et al 2011, Engstr€ om andStehn 2016). However, this role is debated in whether the developers have the right capabilities and objectives to support innovation concerning on-site processes (e.g.…”
Section: Possibilities For Coordinated Construction Logisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authority is often decentralized in temporary project organizations (Gadde and Dubois, 2010;Eriksson, 2013), and innovations generated from creative problem-solving at the sites are not usually spread to other projects, which hampers their diffusion. Diffusion of innovations between projects and the main organizations is similarly hampered (Engström and Stehn, 2016). Moreover, "radical" innovations (extending boundaries of current understanding and practice) are rare in construction (Slaughter, 1998;Loosemore, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%