2016
DOI: 10.4103/2347-5625.177391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Settings: Attitudes and Knowledge of Nurses and Physicians

Abstract: Objective:Healthcare providers (HCPs) play a critical role in reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) related morbidity and mortality. This study aimed at exploring the attitudes and knowledge of nurses and physicians working in primary care settings regarding CRC screening.Methods:A total of 142 HCPs (57.7% nurses and 42.3% physicians) participated in a cross-sectional survey. Data were collected using a Self-administered Questionnaire. The participants were clinically experienced (mean = 9.39 years; standard deviat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
37
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of awareness concerning CRC screening has been linked to limited recommendations for CRC screening on the part of healthcare practitioners and medical recommendations from healthcare practitioners are a strong motivator and predictor for screening participation (Janz et al, 2003). Previous studies conducted in Oman and other Arab countries have noted that the majority of doctors and nurses do not encourage patients to take part in CRC screening as they themselves are not knowledgeable with regards to the recommended frequency of CRC screening or the importance of early CRC screening for high-risk patients (Galal et al, 2016;Muliira et al, 2016). In Palestine, only 14% of participants stated that their doctors had informed them of CRC screening measures (Qumseya et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lack of awareness concerning CRC screening has been linked to limited recommendations for CRC screening on the part of healthcare practitioners and medical recommendations from healthcare practitioners are a strong motivator and predictor for screening participation (Janz et al, 2003). Previous studies conducted in Oman and other Arab countries have noted that the majority of doctors and nurses do not encourage patients to take part in CRC screening as they themselves are not knowledgeable with regards to the recommended frequency of CRC screening or the importance of early CRC screening for high-risk patients (Galal et al, 2016;Muliira et al, 2016). In Palestine, only 14% of participants stated that their doctors had informed them of CRC screening measures (Qumseya et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Oman and other Middle Eastern countries, local healthcare systems do not support continuity of care as patients are often seen by any doctor available whether they attend governmental or private health institutions (Mohammed Al-Azri et al, 2014;Saleh et al, 2015). Thus, improving knowledge of the importance of CRC screening and continuity of care among doctors and healthcare practitioners in Oman should be considered (Muliira et al, 2016). Unfortunately, many doctors practicing in local health centers in Oman lack the time to educate their patients regarding screening measures, especially if they themselves are unaware of official recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Australia (n=1). The Omani study was published in two different articles (Muliira et al, 2016a;2016b), and one Brazilian study was published in three (Hallowell et al, 2017;Perin et al, 2015;Stormo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 studies met one criterion (Boone et al, 2016;Blake & Malone, 2014;De Moraes et al, 2016;De Souza Teixeira et al, 2017;Esteban-Vasallo et al, 2017;Lawvere et al, 2004;McIlfatrick et al, 2014;Muliira et al, 2016aMuliira et al, , 2016bOmran et al, 2015;Patel et al, 2016;Ramos et al, 2010;Shaheen et al, 2000;Shimpi et al, 2016;Yousuf et al, 2012), three met two (Cooper et al, 2014;Ertem, 2009;Meng et al, 2007), and one met three (Hallowell et al, 2017;Perin et al, 2015;Stormo et al, 2014). (Ertem, 2009;Yousuf et al, 2012).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Breast Cancer Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation