“…Dubey, Gunasekaran, Childe, et al (, p. 337) pointed out that although “the triple bottom line concept of SSCM is widely acknowledged, most studies fail to consider all three pillars.” Dubey, Gunasekaran, Childe, et al () conducted an extensive review of SSCM literature, and their findings revealed that the majority of SSCM studies focused on the environmental and economic dimensions, whereas social issues were mostly neglected. For instance, scholars have examined drivers, barriers, and performance outcomes of green supply chain management (Luthra, Garg, & Haleem, ; Scur & Barbosa, ), green manufacturing (Ghazilla et al, ), and green innovations (Abdullah, Zailani, Iranmanesh, & Jayaraman, ). In a similar vein, other studies have explored environmental issues in purchasing and supply management such as green purchasing (Kaur, Sidhu, Awasthi, Chauhan, & Goyal, ), green supply management (Lintukangas, Kähkönen, & Tuppura, ), and green supplier development (Busse, Schleper, Niu, & Wagner, ), thus providing detailed insights about environmental and economic supply chain issues but neglecting a holistic focus on all SSCM dimensions (Panigrahi et al, ).…”