Barriers to HIV Care and Treatment Among Participants in a Public Health HIV Care Relinkage Program

Abstract

Improving patient retention in HIV care and use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) are key steps to improving the HIV care continuum in the US. However, contemporary quantitative data on barriers to care and treatment from population-based samples of persons poorly engaged in care are sparse. We analyzed the prevalence of barriers to clinic visits, ART initiation, and ART continuation reported by 247 participants in a public health HIV care relinkage program in King County, WA. We identified participants using HIV surveillance data (N = 188) and referrals from HIV/STD clinics and partner services (N = 59). Participants most commonly reported insurance (50%), practical (26-34%), and financial (30%) barriers to care, despite residing in a state with essentially universal access to HIV care. Perceived lack of need for medical care was uncommon ( < 20%), but many participants (58%) endorsed a perceived lack of need for medication as a reason for not initiating ART. Depression and substance abuse were both highly prevalent (69% and 54%, respectively), and methamphetamine was the most commonly abused substance. Barriers to HIV care and treatment may be amenable to intervention by health department outreach in coordination with existing HIV medical and support services.

Improving Retention in HIV Care Through New York's Expanded Partner Services Data-to-Care Pilot

“…These reasons are consistent with those reported elsewhere in the literature 10,18,25. Encouragingly, many of these reasons are addressable through HIV care coordination and case management programming.…”

Predictors of Adult Retention in HIV Care: A Systematic Review

“…Tedaldi et al [7] noted that patients who were publicly insured were less likely to be retained in care. Dom-browski et al [23] also identified that cost (e.g. lack of insurance) was a significant barrier to them continuously accessing care despite, as the authors noted, the study being conducted in a US state with universal access to care.…”

“Out of Care” HIV Case Investigations: A Collaborative Analysis Across 6 States in the Northwest US

“… NA, not applicable a King County cases excluded because investigation of those cases began >5 years prior to the surveillance period for this analysis and did not differentiate cases found to have evidence of care during the surveillance period from cases with evidence of care after the surveillance period 15 b Idaho cases were identified using clinic medical records instead of laboratory surveillance reports c Prevalent HIV cases in the jurisdiction at the time of identification of cases for investigation …”

“… a King County cases excluded because investigation of those cases began >5 years prior to the surveillance period for this analysis and did not differentiate cases found to have evidence of care during the surveillance period from cases with evidence of care after the surveillance period 15 …”