2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-015-0871-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to invasive infilling by Brachypodium sylvaticum in Pacific Northwest forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps tilling and mulching in coniferous forests did not change the composition of the plant's growing substrate substantially (especially considering the constant rain of new needles onto the ground), whereas these same actions disturbed deciduous leaf litter enough to provide the seedlings with root access to the soil while keeping enough organic matter present to retain soil moisture (Schramm and Ehrenfeld 2010). In a follow-up study, the abundance of B. sylvaticum seedlings was negatively correlated with deciduous litter cover in both field and controlled microcosm conditions (Taylor et al 2015). Although other environmental influences, such as soil acidity or moisture, may also play a role in abundance of B. sylvaticum in deciduous vs. coniferous forests, these variables most likely covary strongly with forest and leaf litter type and thus would require experiments involving artificial substrate and pH manipulations to disentangle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Perhaps tilling and mulching in coniferous forests did not change the composition of the plant's growing substrate substantially (especially considering the constant rain of new needles onto the ground), whereas these same actions disturbed deciduous leaf litter enough to provide the seedlings with root access to the soil while keeping enough organic matter present to retain soil moisture (Schramm and Ehrenfeld 2010). In a follow-up study, the abundance of B. sylvaticum seedlings was negatively correlated with deciduous litter cover in both field and controlled microcosm conditions (Taylor et al 2015). Although other environmental influences, such as soil acidity or moisture, may also play a role in abundance of B. sylvaticum in deciduous vs. coniferous forests, these variables most likely covary strongly with forest and leaf litter type and thus would require experiments involving artificial substrate and pH manipulations to disentangle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Slender false brome is ideal for use in this study because its performance and competitive ability has been found to be influenced by mycorrhizal colonization (C. Lee, Portland State University, personal communication; R. Workman, unpublished data). It is also ideal for use in examining invasive infilling processes—the potential for the invasive to invade intact native plant communities—not the likelihood of primary invasion success or how the exotic plant might establish in a new environment (Taylor and Cruzan, 2015; Taylor et al, 2015). Understanding the potential roles of CMN and root interactions on competitive outcomes is important for predicting the infilling success and impacts of B. sylvaticum on native plant communities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future it would be desirable to include a more mechanistic model of dispersal to explore the possibility of directional dispersal (Caplat et al 2012a). A final limitation of our study is that we only examined infilling population growth, which is when a population spreads into areas within its existing range (Warren et al 2013, Taylor et al 2015), and therefore we did not examine long distance dispersal. Infilling is important and understudied (Johnson et al 2012b), but our approach offers fewer insights about long distance dispersal, another key stage in conifer invasions, and therefore limits the application of this study to the management of infilling or the reduction of density in an invasion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we decided to examine only the population growth process known as infilling. Infilling can be defined as when the spreading population colonises areas within its existing range, and it occurs because of local dispersal (Warren et al 2013, Taylor et al 2015). We did not gather local demographic data such as birth and death rates at a smaller spatial scale and therefore did not examine directly local demographic dynamics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%