Barriers to Physicians’ Adoption of Healthcare Information Technology: An Empirical Study on Multiple Hospitals

Abstract

Prior research on technology usage had largely overlooked the issue of user resistance or barriers to technology acceptance. Prior research on the Electronic Medical Records had largely focused on technical issues but rarely on managerial issues. Such oversight prevented a better understanding of users' resistance to new technologies and the antecedents of technology rejection. Incorporating the enablers and the inhibitors of technology usage intention, this study explores physicians' reactions towards the electronic medical record. The main focus is on the barriers, perceived threat and perceived inequity. 115 physicians from 6 hospitals participated in the questionnaire survey. Structural Equation Modeling was employed to verify the measurement scale and research hypotheses. According to the results, perceived threat shows a direct and negative effect on perceived usefulness and behavioral intentions, as well as an indirect effect on behavioral intentions via perceived usefulness. Perceived inequity reveals a direct and positive effect on perceived threat, and it also shows a direct and negative effect on perceived usefulness. Besides, perceived inequity reveals an indirect effect on behavioral intentions via perceived usefulness with perceived threat as the inhibitor. The research finding presents a better insight into physicians' rejection and the antecedents of such outcome. For the healthcare industry understanding the factors contributing to physicians' technology acceptance is important as to ensure a smooth implementation of any new technology. The results of this study can also provide change managers reference to a smooth IT introduction into an organization. In addition, our proposed measurement scale can be applied as a diagnostic tool for them to better understand the status quo within their organizations and users' reactions to technology acceptance. By doing so, barriers to physicians' acceptance can be identified earlier and more effectively before leading to technology rejection.

Exploring adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: Applications in the medical industry

“…Therefore, assessing the findings of this research in the light of existing research on the acceptance of HIT, which is very rich, may provide fruitful insights. In early studies, HIT was considered as a threat and an extra workload that is not compensated for by an increase in income (Lin et al, 2012). In the early 2000s, eHealth technologies were discussed in terms of effectiveness, safety, and quality, where the cost-effectiveness of HIT and a lack of best practices were two of the most significant debates (Black et al, 2011).…”

Exploratory Study of Emergency Physicians’ Use of a Prescription Monitoring Program Using a Framework of Technology Acceptance

“…The Technology Acceptance Model has been used to examine physician's adoption of new technologies such as telemedicine, 27 MEDLINE, 26 clinical information systems, 25,31 and electronic medical records. [32][33][34] In at least two prior studies using the Technology Acceptance Model involving physicians, attitude has been shown to explain the greatest amount of variance in physicians' intention to use selected technologies. 25,26 In this study, attitude also explained the greatest amount of variance in EPs' intention to use the PAT database among nonusers.…”

Achieving Data Completeness in Electronic Medical Records: A Conceptual Model and Hypotheses Development

“…During this process, decision makers need to carry out critical decisions and coordination for achieving alignment System design and implementation between business and IT. Here, the EMR implementation could change the existing work processes that may introduce barriers to its adoption [13]. A good understanding and knowledge about EMR systems and supporting technologies could drive the clinic director to make commitment to communication and coordination between IT and clinical staff for EMR implementation and to locate required resources for EMR implementation in care processes.…”