Barriers to reporting of patient safety incidents in tertiary hospitals: A qualitative study of nurses and resident physicians in South Korea

Abstract

We explored the barriers to reporting patient safety incidents experienced by nurses and resident physicians while working in tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Sixteen in-depth interviews with 10 nurses and 6 resident physicians, all of whom had experienced patient safety incidents, were conducted. The interviews were analyzed using directed content analysis in accordance with a coding scheme developed in this study, which contains 4 categories (incidents and reporters, reporting procedures and systems, feedbacks, and reporting culture) and 9 subcategories. The barriers to reporting near-misses included the following: characteristics of the incident (eg, nonhazardous and high frequency), reporters' lack of knowledge, uncertainty, fear of blame, lack of role model, and inappropriate responses. Reporting adverse/sentinel events was also prevented by feelings of pressure or guilt, the fact that reporting was nonmandatory, and a belief that reporting was not part of the job. Some other barriers included lack of education, review process after reporting, lack of confidentiality when reporting, absence of feedback for reporting, unfair reporting based on work experience, perception of potential blame, and stigmatization resulting from it. In South Korea, a national system for reporting and learning of patient safety accidents has been operating since July 2016. To fully implement this system, it is necessary to encourage reporting at the institutional level. Our results might help reduce the barriers to patient safety incident reporting among nurses and resident physicians in tertiary hospitals in Korea through informing the development of improvement plans.

Understanding Physicians’ and Nurses’ Adaption of National-Leading Patient Safety Culture Policy: A Qualitative Study in Tertiary and General Hospitals in Korea

“…Additionally, leaders were identified as the entity that played a crucial role in building culture, similar to the previous studies that emphasized the role of leaders. 21 22 26 Insufficient human resources, excessive workload, and poor work environments were identified as factors that interfered with patient safety. Therefore, human and material support are essential for improving PSC.…”

Changes in the working conditions and learning environment of medical residents after the enactment of the Medical Resident Act in Korea in 2015: a national 4-year longitudinal study

“…Ensuring duty hour restrictions was a major aim of the Medical Resident Act and a major controversial issue. With the passing of the legislation, concerns were raised that it would be too difficult to reduce training physicians’ working hours given practical circumstances, such as general hospitals with an excessive patient load or smaller institutions with chronic workforce shortages [ 11 ]. However, the above results showed that working conditions gradually began to comply with the new standards, with more full days off-duty and guaranteed vacation time.…”

How do healthcare practitioners use incident data to improve patient safety in Japan? A qualitative study

“…The recent global pandemic has reinforced the view that universal access to public health and care systems needs to be prioritized, and that our representative democracy with its polarized views regarding science and expertise may be ineffective in handling new patterns of risk and uncertainty [1][2][3][4]. Since the late 1990s, the regulation of risks to patients in the health and social care sector has come under severe scrutiny in many countries [5,6] The incident reporting and learning system (IRL) was adopted in healthcare organizations, and became one of the major policy measures [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], following other safety-critical industries such as nuclear power, offshore oil exploration and aviation [15]. This safety information system normally relies on reports submitted by frontline staff, and contains data that cover near-misses, adverse events and safety concerns.…”