Barriers to sexual health provision for people with intellectual disability: A disability service provider and clinician perspective

Abstract

Background Sexual health remains one of the most overlooked areas of life for people with intellectual disability. In recent years there has been an increasing expectation that this issue will be addressed by disability service providers. In this paper we examine the barriers to sexual health provision of people with intellectual disability as experienced by disability service providers and clinicians. Method This research uses a constructionist grounded theory approach. It was conducted in 2 phases using semistructured qualitative interviews to collect data from disability service managers and clinicians working with people with intellectual disability in New South Wales, Australia. Findings and Discussion Key themes within the interviewsincluding funding shortages and a lack of policy guidelineswere identified as significant administrative barriers to sexual health provision. Myths about the sexual health of people with intellectual disability, family attitudes, and lack of staff training were also identified as barriers.

The views and experiences of families and direct care support workers regarding the expression of sexuality by adults with intellectual disabilities: A narrative review of the international research evidence

“…Such programmes may take the form of knowledge and skills acquisition that aim to help families and carers explore and more fully understand the various aspects of sexual expression and needs from their own viewpoint, and the perspectives of people with ID (Gardiner & Brandon, 2009;Kok & Akyuz, 2015;Schaafsma et al, 2013;Yildiz & Cavkaytar, 2017). Other areas include sexual health needs (Thompson et al, 2014), the potential for exploitation and harm, including online targeting (Byrne, 2017;Chadwick et al, 2017), sexuality beliefs and misconceptions (Rushbrook et al, 2014b) and how families and carers can support the expression of sexuality and the development of intimate relationships in people with ID (Fulford & Cobigo, 2018;Wilkinson et al, 2015).…”

Reproductive (In)Justice and Inequality in the Lives of Women with Intellectual Disabilities in Scotland

“…No time is taken to support us to understand. (Beth,20s) People with intellectual disabilities are routinely infantilised and have been subject to legacies of restriction from equal sexual and intimate citizenship (Hollomotz 2009;Thompson et al 2014). Girl's and women's intimate citizenship is hidden through macro gender inequalities that locate women's lives in the so-called 'private' sphere.…”

Norm Internalization and Disability-inclusive Elections in the Philippines

“…Despite making up at least 15 percent of the global population (World Health Organization 2011), persons with disabilities (PWDs) have been tagged as one of the excluded groups in society since the 1970s (Sen 2000). They are discriminated in opportunities for employment (Mercat-Bruns 2016;Shier, Graham, and Jones 2009), health (Thompson, Stancliffe, Broom, & Wilson, 2014), education (Peters 2008;Kearney 2016), and participation in community life (Fumarco 2017;Park 2017). More specifically, women with disabilities suffer from multiple discrimination due to the intersectionality of their gender, disability, and social status (Samararatne and Soldatic 2015;Holness 2016;Senne 2016).…”