2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
307
0
17

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
307
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…' In theory the ideas underpinning the concept of the circular economy might seem straightforward, but in practice a number of operational challenges can be identified. Ritzen and Sandstrom (2017), for example, identified a number of attitudinal, financial, structural, and technological barriers to a transition to a more circular economy. A shift towards a circular model was also perceived to require far reaching changes within companies and such changes take both time and investment and where corporate financial systems are focused on rapid returns on investment and cost savings this currently does not encourage long term strategic change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…' In theory the ideas underpinning the concept of the circular economy might seem straightforward, but in practice a number of operational challenges can be identified. Ritzen and Sandstrom (2017), for example, identified a number of attitudinal, financial, structural, and technological barriers to a transition to a more circular economy. A shift towards a circular model was also perceived to require far reaching changes within companies and such changes take both time and investment and where corporate financial systems are focused on rapid returns on investment and cost savings this currently does not encourage long term strategic change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material demand of a supply chain element n of the supply chain m after material efficiency improvement by the factor xw can be calculated according to Equation (3) as follows: min m,na = mout m,na ((1 + xw(ηm,nb − 1)/ηm,nb (3) in which b represents the status before optimisation, a the status after optimisation, xw the improvement in waste reduction, and ηm,nb the material efficiency of the above mentioned supply chain element before its optimisation. Figure 1 shows an example calculation for the supply chain element number 4 in paint manufacturing, which is the last supply chain element of supply chain number 1, where mwaste represents the mass of waste per year of the supply chain element.…”
Section: Calculation Of Efficiency Improvements In the Supply Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evaluation of barriers to improve material efficiency in industrial companies, concerning circular economy considerations has been provided by Ritzén et al [3]. The origins of the circular economy approach emanate from several schools of thought and theories that challenge the established economic system, based on overconsumption due to the finiteness of natural resources [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This movement has gained considerable traction because of the tireless efforts of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation [3]. Nevertheless, there are claims that beyond recycling [2], the circular economy concept has only rarely and fragmentally been adopted by business [4]. Conversely, a significant number of barriers to the implementation of the circular economy have been identified [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are claims that beyond recycling [2], the circular economy concept has only rarely and fragmentally been adopted by business [4]. Conversely, a significant number of barriers to the implementation of the circular economy have been identified [4]. Interestingly, these barriers refer mostly to socio-economic aspects and decision-making at multiple levels-e.g., product design, integration into production processes, perception of sustainability, risk aversion, and unclear responsibility distribution [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%