2014
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barriers to upstream passage by two migratory sculpins, prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) and coastrange sculpin (Cottus aleuticus), in northern Puget Sound lowland streams

Abstract: We identified and characterized barriers to the upstream distribution by prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) and coastrange sculpin (Cottus aleuticus), based on their longitudinal distribution in 11 streams in the Puget Sound lowlands of Washington State. Eight streams had upstream limits associated with particular instream structures, and these were compared to distinguish features of barriers and non-barriers. In seven streams perch height greater than 15 cm resulted in a complete barrier. In one stream water vel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We defined characteristics of potential natural (cascades and waterfalls) and anthropogenic (culverts, diversion dams) barriers using published literature and governmental reports for each species (westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout: Behlke, Kane, McLean, & Travis, 1991; Bell, Delacy, Paulik, Bruya, & Scott, 1981; Reiser & Peacock, 1995; WDFW, 2009; sculpin: Adams et al., 2015; LeMoine & Bodensteiner, 2014; Utzinger, Roth, & Peter, 1998; see Figure S1). Description of barriers to longnose dace passage are nonexistent, but a body size similar to sculpin suggests they have similar passage requirements (Nislow, Hudy, Letcher, & Smith, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We defined characteristics of potential natural (cascades and waterfalls) and anthropogenic (culverts, diversion dams) barriers using published literature and governmental reports for each species (westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout: Behlke, Kane, McLean, & Travis, 1991; Bell, Delacy, Paulik, Bruya, & Scott, 1981; Reiser & Peacock, 1995; WDFW, 2009; sculpin: Adams et al., 2015; LeMoine & Bodensteiner, 2014; Utzinger, Roth, & Peter, 1998; see Figure S1). Description of barriers to longnose dace passage are nonexistent, but a body size similar to sculpin suggests they have similar passage requirements (Nislow, Hudy, Letcher, & Smith, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, East Twin Creek had vertical drops (due to rocks and a culvert) . 20 cm, a height shown to prevent upstream passage of other sculpin species (Utzinger et al, 1998;LeMoine, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information demonstrates that both species richness and the densities of species differ among stream types. Furthermore, our results support the contention that sculpin are an effective indicator taxon for alterations to stream connectivity (Favaro et al ., ) given their benthic habit and weak swimming abilities (Nelson & Paetz, ; Lemoine, Bodensteiner & Tierney, ). Conversely, Northern Redside Dace and Finescale Dace densities were positively associated with culverted streams in the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%