A Handbook of Economic Anthropology 2005
DOI: 10.4337/9781845423469.00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Barter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of this article, what it is relevant in this literature is that it defines commodity as an impersonal transaction of unlike goods and services that takes place between independent, self‐interested individuals who exchange alienable private properties defined primarily in terms of use and exchange value, with the aim of obtaining material benefits or profit. When the exchange involves goods and services that are alike, and is aimed at reinforcing the social relationship between the trading partners, rather than the pursuit of individual profit, we are in the presence of “gift” exchange (see, e.g., Gregory 1982; Mauss 1990; Carrier 1991:121, 1995; Heady 2005). So, while in commodity exchanges the focus is on the goods or services, in gift exchanges it is on the social relationship between the transacting partners (Heady 2005:270).…”
Section: The “Transacting Other” and The Morality Of Truequementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the sake of this article, what it is relevant in this literature is that it defines commodity as an impersonal transaction of unlike goods and services that takes place between independent, self‐interested individuals who exchange alienable private properties defined primarily in terms of use and exchange value, with the aim of obtaining material benefits or profit. When the exchange involves goods and services that are alike, and is aimed at reinforcing the social relationship between the trading partners, rather than the pursuit of individual profit, we are in the presence of “gift” exchange (see, e.g., Gregory 1982; Mauss 1990; Carrier 1991:121, 1995; Heady 2005). So, while in commodity exchanges the focus is on the goods or services, in gift exchanges it is on the social relationship between the transacting partners (Heady 2005:270).…”
Section: The “Transacting Other” and The Morality Of Truequementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the exchange involves goods and services that are alike, and is aimed at reinforcing the social relationship between the trading partners, rather than the pursuit of individual profit, we are in the presence of “gift” exchange (see, e.g., Gregory 1982; Mauss 1990; Carrier 1991:121, 1995; Heady 2005). So, while in commodity exchanges the focus is on the goods or services, in gift exchanges it is on the social relationship between the transacting partners (Heady 2005:270). Yet, once again, trueque seems to escape these category definitions.…”
Section: The “Transacting Other” and The Morality Of Truequementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations