1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.52.1393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baryon Distribution in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…She question is: which parts of the excited object after the first collision can interact with which interaction probability and which (de-)excitation scheme? In some models only the outgoing leading hadrons can interact furtheron, either with a modified excitation scheme [9] or the same as used for the first collision [10]. In other approaches the excited projectile is kept stable using the Same interaction probabilities and excitation scheme afterwards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She question is: which parts of the excited object after the first collision can interact with which interaction probability and which (de-)excitation scheme? In some models only the outgoing leading hadrons can interact furtheron, either with a modified excitation scheme [9] or the same as used for the first collision [10]. In other approaches the excited projectile is kept stable using the Same interaction probabilities and excitation scheme afterwards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is natural that since early times the study of the inelasticity has received special attention by both experimentalists and theoreticians. More recently, it has also aroused interest in connection with the production of a quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Yet, experimental data are rather scarce and the theoretical understanding of several aspects of the inelasticity, such as its distribution and E 0 dependence, is far from being satisfactory.…”
Section: Inelasticity Distributions In High-energy P-nucleus Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the idea [11] that in highenergy collisions valence quarks weakly interact so that they almost pass through the interaction zone, whereas gluons interact strongly, producing an indefinite number of mini-fireballs, which eventually form a unique large central fireball (all possible qq sea quarks are, in this model, "converted" to equivalent gluons). This feature of the IGM makes it quite attractive because it allows us to study not only the leading-particle spectrum [2][3][4][5][6] but also other relevant quantities as momentum distributions [12], correlations, etc.…”
Section: Inelasticity Distributions In High-energy P-nucleus Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The u n c e r t a i n t y i n t h e estimated p r o b a b i l i t i e s r e s u l t e d from systematic e r r o r i n t h e d a t a as w e l l as those introduced by t h e assumption.' [3][4][5][6] of f u r t h e r i n v e s t i g a t i o n s i n t o t h e question of nuclear stopping power.…”
Section: Inclusive Proton Spectra From P-a Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%