2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-022-02403-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basal cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients versus the general population: clinicopathologic study

Abstract: Organ transplant recipients (OTRs) are at greater risk of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) than non-OTRs, but histopathologic differences between BCCs in OTRs and the general population are largely unknown. We compared clinicopathologic features of BCCs in OTRs vs the general population in Queensland, Australia. Details of BCC tumors (site, size, level of invasion, subtype, biopsy procedure) were collected from histopathology reports in two prospective skin cancer studies, one in OTRs and one general-population-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 For example, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) occurs 65-2503 more frequently in SOTR. [3][4][5][6] Likewise, mortality related to melanoma (MEL), CSCC, and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is higher among SOTR than among nontransplanted individuals. [3][4][5][7][8][9] With approximately 35,000 solid organ transplants performed annually in the United States, the at-risk population grows each year, as does the need for safe and effective cancer treatment options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 For example, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) occurs 65-2503 more frequently in SOTR. [3][4][5][6] Likewise, mortality related to melanoma (MEL), CSCC, and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is higher among SOTR than among nontransplanted individuals. [3][4][5][7][8][9] With approximately 35,000 solid organ transplants performed annually in the United States, the at-risk population grows each year, as does the need for safe and effective cancer treatment options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%