2021
DOI: 10.4103/ams.ams_446_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basal implants: An asset for rehabilitation of atrophied resorbed maxillary and mandibular jaw – A prospective study

Abstract: Introduction: Conventional implants have great limitations in case of atrophic maxillary and mandibular ridges. Ultimately, patients who have severely atrophied jawbones paradoxically receive little or no treatment, as long as conventional implants are considered the device of first choice. Basal implants were developed with the goal to overcome the limitations of conventional implantology, primarily for atrophied ridges or inadequate bone with the protocol of immediate loading. However, studies r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of basal implants is novel. According to numerous consensus findings on basal implantology, the theory of osseofixation, immediate loading, and implant of the site have all shown excellent results [ 3 , 5 ]. Numerous investigations have been conducted since then to compile information on its success and survival rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concept of basal implants is novel. According to numerous consensus findings on basal implantology, the theory of osseofixation, immediate loading, and implant of the site have all shown excellent results [ 3 , 5 ]. Numerous investigations have been conducted since then to compile information on its success and survival rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other surgical therapies may be necessary in addition to implant implantation for certain operations, such as extensive grafting, direct or indirect sinus lifts, and nerve lateralization. These procedures are not always feasible and rely on certain methods [ 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After an average of 18.93 +8.41 months of monitoring, Oleg et al [ 13 ] found a very high cumulative implant survival rate of 95.7%. In comparison to crestal implants, proponents of basal Implant systems claim that they can repair almost every situation with greater success in less time and with a lower risk of complications [ 14 , 15 ]. These findings, however, are still being tested over the long term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 This loss of alveolar dimension can be managed successfully by taking support from the cortical bone. [3][4][5] The need for complicated augmentation surgical procedures to increase the alveolar bone support is eliminated. 1,6 Several other good success rate, immediate loading, minimally invasive procedure, reduced treatment time, minimal chances of peri-implantitis are some of the advantages that come in hand with the use of basal implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%