1965
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1965.tb05326.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basal Skin Conductance and Neonatal State

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this does not make it possible to dismiss the possibility of child effects. Second-or later-born neonates show higher skin conductance than firstborn (Weller & Bell, 1965). There is collateral evidence that this indicates heightened arousal and greater maturity in this early period, though there is no information available on later development.…”
Section: Reinterpretation Of Recentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not make it possible to dismiss the possibility of child effects. Second-or later-born neonates show higher skin conductance than firstborn (Weller & Bell, 1965). There is collateral evidence that this indicates heightened arousal and greater maturity in this early period, though there is no information available on later development.…”
Section: Reinterpretation Of Recentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). There was no such sex difference in class B. that mothers do not treat their sons and daughters in the same way even in early infancy (Moss, 1967;Levine, Fishman and Kagan, 1967;Goldberg and Lewis, 1969), and girl and boy babies differ in behaviour (Smith, 1936;Weller and Bell, 1965;Moss, 1967). Goldberg and Lewis (1969) have shown that l-yr-old girls prefer fine motor activities while boys spend more time in gross motor activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts aimed at exploring these variables in infancy have met with mixed success. Sex differences have been reported by Bell and his co-workers in neonates' reactions to various stimuli (Bell & Costello, 1964;Bell & Darling, 1965;Weller & Bell, 1965); by Kagan and Lewis (1965), and by Lewis (1969) in infants' attentive responses and by Goldberg and Lewis (1969) in infant-mother attachment and in play behavior. Social class differences have been reported by Wachs, Uzgiris, and Hunt (1967) for tasks involving motor imitations and verbal facility, and on subtests of the Infant Psychological Development Scale based on Piaget's model of intellectual development.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%