2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01125.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basaltic micrometeorites from the Novaya Zemlya glacier

Abstract: Abstract-A large number of micrometeorites (MMs) was recovered from glacier deposits located at the north-eastern passive margin of the Novaya Zemlya glacier sheet. Melted, scoriaceous, and unmelted micrometeorites (UMMs) are present. Unmelted micrometeorites are dominated mostly by chondritic matter, but also a few achondritic MMs are present. Here we report the discovery of four UMMs that, according to their texture, mineralogy, and chemistry, are identified as basaltic breccias. Mineral chemistry and Fe ⁄ M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This proportion is slightly higher than those estimated from other micrometeorite collections: differentiated cosmic spherules represent 0.5 ± 0.4% of the South Pole Water Well micrometeorite collection (Taylor et al, 2007) and basaltic unmelted micrometeorites represent 0.2-0.5% of the Novaya Zemlya glacier collection (Badjukov et al, 2010). This slight discrepancy in the estimated influx of differentiated precursors can be due to the difference in the examined size fractions (200-900 lm for the Transantarctic Mountain collection and <500 lm in the South Pole Water Well collection and in the Novaya Zemlya glacier collection) or to the difference in the proportions of melted versus unmelted particles (98% of cosmic spherules in the Transantarctic Mountain collection and $75% in the South Pole Water Well collection and in the Novaya Zemlya glacier collection; Rochette et al, 2008;Taylor et al, 2000;Badjukov et al, 2010). As stated above, differentiated Mg-poor particles are more likely to melt during atmospheric entry and to be present in higher proportions in micrometeorite collections rich in cosmic spherules.…”
Section: Influx Of Differentiated Micrometeoroids From the Transantarmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This proportion is slightly higher than those estimated from other micrometeorite collections: differentiated cosmic spherules represent 0.5 ± 0.4% of the South Pole Water Well micrometeorite collection (Taylor et al, 2007) and basaltic unmelted micrometeorites represent 0.2-0.5% of the Novaya Zemlya glacier collection (Badjukov et al, 2010). This slight discrepancy in the estimated influx of differentiated precursors can be due to the difference in the examined size fractions (200-900 lm for the Transantarctic Mountain collection and <500 lm in the South Pole Water Well collection and in the Novaya Zemlya glacier collection) or to the difference in the proportions of melted versus unmelted particles (98% of cosmic spherules in the Transantarctic Mountain collection and $75% in the South Pole Water Well collection and in the Novaya Zemlya glacier collection; Rochette et al, 2008;Taylor et al, 2000;Badjukov et al, 2010). As stated above, differentiated Mg-poor particles are more likely to melt during atmospheric entry and to be present in higher proportions in micrometeorite collections rich in cosmic spherules.…”
Section: Influx Of Differentiated Micrometeoroids From the Transantarmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Such pyroxene-dominated lithologies have also been recognized among unmelted basaltic micrometeorites (Badjukov et al, 2010). On the other hand, Type 3 spherule compositions can be modeled as bulk eucrite compositions with an excess of orthopyroxene (80-90 vol.%).…”
Section: Mineralogy Of the Spherule Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cosmic spherules from the Novaya Zemlya Archi pelago were collected in the marginal part of the Novaya Zemlya ice cap (Badjukov and Raitala, 2003;Badjukov et al, 2010). Samples of solid sediment on ice (cryoco nite) were washed to get rid of the clay constituent and subjected to magnetic separation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%