Based on Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process to construct the Evaluation Index system of nursing simulation teaching quality

Shen, Liang; Yang, Jianhua; Jin, Xingming; Hou, Luoya; Shang, Shaomei; Zhang, Yan

doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.021

Cited by 87 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To judge the degree of expert opinion coordination, Kendall's W was adopted. The value of Kendall's W was between 0 and 1, and the higher the value means, the opinion of the experts was more consistent and the coordination of the questionnaire was better [ 10 ]. In the first round, the W value was 0.657 (significance test X 2 = 218.620, P < 0.001).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The degree of concentration of expert opinions was analyzed by the importance value and coefficient of variation. The greater the importance assignment, the smaller the coefficient of variation value indicated that the degree of expert opinion concentration was better [ 10 ]. The importance value in the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions was 3.80 to 4.70 points, 3.70 to 4.50 points, and 3.60 to 4.40 points, respectively, in the first round and 4.30 to 4.80 points, 4.10 to 4.60 points, and 4.00 to 4.50 points, respectively, in the second round.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Development, Reliability, and Validity of the“Knowledge‐Attitude‐Practice” Questionnaire of Foreigners on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment

Zhang

Qiao

et al. 2020

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To develop a “knowledge-attitude-practice” questionnaire as an evaluating tool of foreigners’ cognition on TCM treatment, so as to promote the internationalization of TCM. Methods. The questionnaire was based on the “knowledge-attitude-practice” model and adjusted by expert consultation using the Delphi method. After conducting a survey among foreigners, Cronbach’s α and exploratory factor analysis were used to test the internal consistency reliability and structural validity of the questionnaire, respectively. Results. A total of 10 experts participated in two rounds of expert consultation. The recovery rates of two rounds of expert consultation form were 100.0%. The coefficient authority in two rounds of expert consultation was 0.87 and 0.88, respectively. The concentration of expert opinions in the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions was 3.80 to 4.70 points, 3.70 to 4.50 points, and 3.60 to 4.40 points, respectively, in the first round and 4.30 to 4.80 points, 4.10 to 4.60 points, and 4.00 to 4.50 points, respectively, in the second round. The coefficient of variation in the knowledge, attitude, and practice dimensions was 0.10–0.32, 0.16–0.29, and 0.19–0.35, respectively, in the first round and 0.09–0.19, 0.15–0.25, and 0.16–0.31, respectively, in the second round. The W value and significance test x 2 in the first round were 0.657 and 218.620 while those in the second round were 0.671 and 181.181 P < 0.001 . 8 items were deleted and 1 item was added, and other reserved items were modified according to the statistical analysis results of evaluation items and expert suggestions after the first round and there were no changes after the second round. The revised questionnaire includes three dimensions of knowledge, attitude, and practice, with a total of 30 items. After translating the questionnaire into English, it was conducted in 176 foreigners. Cronbach’s α coefficient of the total questionnaire, knowledge dimension, attitude dimension, and practice dimension was 0.908, 0.781, 0.823, and 0.918, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 factors with a cumulative contribution of 54.090%. After testing reliability and validity, 1 item was deleted, leaving 29 items. Conclusions. After two rounds of expert consultation based on the Delphi method, the results of expert authority, expert coordination, and expert opinions’ concentration were promising, and the expert consultation results were reliable. The “knowledge-attitude-practice” questionnaire of foreigners on TCM treatment in English had good reliability and validity and can evaluate foreigners’ cognition on TCM treatment.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development, Reliability, and Validity of the“Knowledge‐Attitude‐Practice” Questionnaire of Foreigners on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment

Zhang

Qiao

et al. 2020

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The index inclusion criterion: Mean value assignment >4.5; coe cient of variation<3. If the importance score is between 3.5 and 4.5, the research team needed to discuss and decide whether the indicator items needed to be retained or deleted (Shen et al, 2019). In the second round of Delphi expert consultation, the opinions of all experts tended to be the same, the evaluation index system was con rmed.…”

Section: Delphi Consulting and Feedback Cyclementioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of An Index System of Core Competence Assessment For Infectious Disease Specialist Nurse: A Delphi Study

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim and objective: To establish an index system for the evaluation of infectious disease specialist nurse core competence.Background: An index system for the evaluation of infectious disease specialist nurse core competence has not been established.Design: A two-round Delphi survey sought opinions from experts about the index system for the evaluation of infectious disease specialist nurse core competence.Methods: Based on the methods of literature retrieval, theoretical analysis and qualitative research, the draft of core competence evaluation index system of infectious disease specialist nurses was constructed. A Delphi survey was used for the study of 30 infectious disease experts from 8 provinces and cities around China. A modified recommendation for the Conducting and Reporting of Delphi studies (CREDES) was used to guide this study. A STROBE checklist was used.Results: The evaluation index system of core competence of diseases specialist nurses is composed of 6 primary indicators which includes Nursing Abilities for infectious diseases, Infection Prevention and Control Capabilities, Capabilities in Response to Infectious Disease, Professional Development Capabilities, Communication and Management Capabilities and Professionalism and Humanistic Accomplishment, 16 secondary indicators and 47 tertiary indicators. The authority coefficient, judgment coefficient and familiarity degree of Delphi experts were 0.923, 0.933 and 0.913 respectively.Conclusions: The evaluation index system of core competence of diseases specialist nurses is scientific and reliable. It can be reference for future training and assessment of infectious disease specialist nurses.Relevance to clinical practice: Infectious disease specialist nurses are the main force for infectious disease nursing. Their core competence is related to the quality of infectious disease nursing and treatment. The core competence of the nurses is important for identification of training strategies and can be regarded as reference for nurse assessment and promotion. The construction of the index system is based on the consensus of infectious disease experts, which is helpful to standardize the training strategies and selection standards of infectious disease specialist nurses in the future and meet the needs of clinical infectious disease nursing.

show abstract

“…It integrates multiple independent factors into a composite factor to simplify the complexity of rankings and has been accepted by decision makers [23]. The AHP has also been successfully applied in hospital site selection [24], the evaluation of energy production technologies [25], teaching quality assessment [26], environmental and economic assessment [27].…”

Section: Of 14mentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization and Evaluation of Ventilation Mode in Marine Data Center Based on AHP-Entropy Weight

Feng

Lei

Guo

et al. 2019

Entropy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ventilation mode affects the cooling efficiency of the air conditioners significantly in marine data centers. Three different ventilation modes, namely, underfloor ventilation, overhead ventilation, side ventilation, are numerically investigated for a typical marine data center. Four independent parameters, including temperature, velocity, air age, and uniformity index, are applied to evaluate the performances of the three ventilation modes. Further, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) entropy weight model is established and further analysis is conducted to find the optimal ventilation mode of the marine data center. The results indicate that the underfloor ventilation mode has the best performance in the airflow patterns and temperature distribution evaluation projects, with the highest scores of 91.84 and 90.60. If low energy consumption is required, it is recommended to select the overhead ventilation mode with a maximum score of 93.50. The current evaluation results agree fairly well with the three dimensional simulation results, which further proves that the AHP entropy weight method is reasonable and has a high adaptability for the evaluation of air conditioning ventilation modes.

show abstract

Based on Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process to construct the Evaluation Index system of nursing simulation teaching quality

Cited by 87 publications

References 22 publications

Development, Reliability, and Validity of the“Knowledge‐Attitude‐Practice” Questionnaire of Foreigners on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment

Development, Reliability, and Validity of the“Knowledge‐Attitude‐Practice” Questionnaire of Foreigners on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment

Construction of An Index System of Core Competence Assessment For Infectious Disease Specialist Nurse: A Delphi Study

Optimization and Evaluation of Ventilation Mode in Marine Data Center Based on AHP-Entropy Weight

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About