1996
DOI: 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00070-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline contamination assessment for a new resource recovery facility in Germany part II: atmospheric concentrations of PCDD/F

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Levels measured in Porto are consistent with data published for Barcelona, on the NE coast of the Iberian Peninsula, where the reported maximum concentrations were in the range of 600 to 800 fg I-TEQ m -3 (Abad et al 2004). Several studies performed in different airsheds (Hippelein et al 1996;Fiedler et al 1997a) have shown that atmospheric levels of PCDD/PCDF follow a typical seasonal variation characterized by higher concentrations during winter when compared with typical summer concentrations. This seasonal pattern can be explained by the intensification of the operation of diverse combustion sources during winter as well as by the more frequent presence of thermal inversion layers at the surface level during winter.…”
Section: Soilsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Levels measured in Porto are consistent with data published for Barcelona, on the NE coast of the Iberian Peninsula, where the reported maximum concentrations were in the range of 600 to 800 fg I-TEQ m -3 (Abad et al 2004). Several studies performed in different airsheds (Hippelein et al 1996;Fiedler et al 1997a) have shown that atmospheric levels of PCDD/PCDF follow a typical seasonal variation characterized by higher concentrations during winter when compared with typical summer concentrations. This seasonal pattern can be explained by the intensification of the operation of diverse combustion sources during winter as well as by the more frequent presence of thermal inversion layers at the surface level during winter.…”
Section: Soilsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Table 2 shows the ambient atmospheric PCDD/F concentrations (0.312-4.58 pg N m −3 ) and corresponding I-TEQ values (0.0319-0.256 pg N m −3 ) of all samples collected at the 10 chosen sites in the four seasons studied. For all these samples, the dioxin concentrations measured were comparable to those reported for other urban cities [7][8][9][10]. It is evident from this table that the ratio of PCDDs/PCDFs (TEQ) of each location did not exhibit a trend of temporal variations over the sampling periods.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysis (Pca)supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The observed winter effect is often explained via seasonallycontrolled dominant factors for the emission and degradation of PCDDs/Fs and/or seasonal change in air mass movement (Hippelein et al, 1996;Duarte et al, 1997;Lee et al, 1999;Lohmann et al, 1999). The former generally refers to higher emission of home heating in the winter and faster PCDD/F degradation rates in the summer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%