2010
DOI: 10.1039/b922045c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline correction using adaptive iteratively reweighted penalized least squares

Abstract: Baseline drift always blurs or even swamps signals and deteriorates analytical results, particularly in multivariate analysis. It is necessary to correct baseline drift to perform further data analysis. Simple or modified polynomial fitting has been found to be effective to some extent. However, this method requires user intervention and is prone to variability especially in low signal-to-noise ratio environments. A novel algorithm named adaptive iteratively reweighted Penalized Least Squares (airPLS) that doe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
492
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 821 publications
(502 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
492
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For removing background coming from the measured material (fluorescence) or signal from the substrate different methods have been developed that are capable of handling irregularly shaped baselines [125][126][127][128]. Baseline correction of Raman spectra is especially important prior to multivariate methods and different solutions to improve baseline correction methods have been developed [125,129,130].…”
Section: Spectra Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For removing background coming from the measured material (fluorescence) or signal from the substrate different methods have been developed that are capable of handling irregularly shaped baselines [125][126][127][128]. Baseline correction of Raman spectra is especially important prior to multivariate methods and different solutions to improve baseline correction methods have been developed [125,129,130].…”
Section: Spectra Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34] A chemometric approach (of which there are many) was preferred because this could be more easily implemented on conventional Raman systems. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Morphological weighted penalized least squares (MPLS) 49 was used for baseline correction of Raman spectra because of its inherent simplicity, combined with its flexibility, suitability for automation, and effectiveness at mitigating baseline artefacts. MPLS required neither a priori knowledge nor subjective user intervention, and was reasonably efficient computationally (~5 minutes for 8410 spectra).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…由于实际测量信号的复杂性, 计算过程中将数据矩 阵按保留时间顺序划分为 14 个保留时间区间依次进行 了解析. 同时, 为了减小背景对计算的干扰, 本文采用 了自适应迭代加权惩罚最小二乘(airPLS)法 [23] 对实验信 号中的背景进行了扣除.…”
Section: 计算unclassified