2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45107-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline markers of cortical excitation and inhibition predict response to theta burst stimulation treatment for youth depression

Prabhjot Dhami,
Sylvain Moreno,
Paul E. Croarkin
et al.

Abstract: Theta burst stimulation (TBS), a specific form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is a promising treatment for youth with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who do not respond to conventional therapies. However, given the variable response to TBS, a greater understanding of how baseline features relate to clinical response is needed to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from this treatment. In the current study, we sought to determine if baseline neurophysiology, specifically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 80% of patients self-reported a benefit from rTMS treatment. Specifically, the response rate (defined by a 50% reduction in depression scores) of 42.5% appears to be mostly consistent with the range of response reported in other studies assessing rTMS efficacy in both adults (~46-68%) 33,34 and youth (~41-56%) 35,36 . However, our observed response rates may be considered slightly lower than in previous published works on youth, likely due to the naturalistic nature of our study and the less controlled, more varied treatment parameters and clinical characteristics of the included patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Overall, 80% of patients self-reported a benefit from rTMS treatment. Specifically, the response rate (defined by a 50% reduction in depression scores) of 42.5% appears to be mostly consistent with the range of response reported in other studies assessing rTMS efficacy in both adults (~46-68%) 33,34 and youth (~41-56%) 35,36 . However, our observed response rates may be considered slightly lower than in previous published works on youth, likely due to the naturalistic nature of our study and the less controlled, more varied treatment parameters and clinical characteristics of the included patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%