2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline of the butyltin distribution in surface sediments (0–20cm) of the Elbe estuary (Germany, 2011)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle sizes were determined using a cascade of sieves with mesh sizes between 2 000 µm and 20 µm. Dry-sieving applied to fractions of ≥ 630 µm, whereas for smaller fractions wet-sieving in an ultrasonic bath was used (procedure according to [ 23 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle sizes were determined using a cascade of sieves with mesh sizes between 2 000 µm and 20 µm. Dry-sieving applied to fractions of ≥ 630 µm, whereas for smaller fractions wet-sieving in an ultrasonic bath was used (procedure according to [ 23 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A baseline study of the TBT distribution in surface sediment of the Elbe estuary in 2011 ranged from 'undetectable' at the mouth to 100 µg TBT cation/kg sediment dw near the port of Hamburg (Wetzel et al, 2013; Sn to TBT cation conversion rate 2.44). At the 2003 and 2009 common sampling site BSC3, a 10-fold decrease in TBT levels was measured in the organism as well as in its habitat sediment.…”
Section: Tbt Levels In the Southern North Seamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper assesses different aspects of TBT pollution in C. crangon in its main distribution range, the southern North Sea and does not focus on an overall review on TBT data and effects in the marine environment, as the TBT levels vary by a high factor in different locations. For comprehensive reviews, we refer to, among other (Evans et al, 1996;Fent, 1996;Champ, 2000;Birchenough et al, 2002;Stronckhorst and van Hattum, 2003;Antizar-Ladislao, 2008;Morton, 2009;Oliveira et al, 2009;Rodríguez et al, 2009;Sousa et al, 2009;Bengtsson and Wernersson, 2012;Sunday et al, 2012;Matthiessen, 2013;Wetzel et al, 2013;OSPAR, 2014;Langston et al, 2015;Nicolaus and Barry, 2015;Wilson et al, 2015;Schøyen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many published papers have demonstrated that TBT is adsorbed onto sediments preferably by binding with organic matter [10,11], contradictory results on the relationship between TBT levels and TOC in natural marine sediments can be found. Some authors stated that significant correlations exist between the TOC and TBT concentration [3,[37][38][39], while others found little or no correlation [13,32]. However, most of these data refer only to surface sediments; thus, they do not provide any information about the influence of organic matter on the TBT degradation over time.…”
Section: Sediment Characteristics As Parameters Controlling Tbt Degramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain size can indirectly influence TBT adsorption by defining the amount of adsorbed organic matter because it is well established that fine fractions adsorb more organic molecules [32,41]. Consequently, some authors have demonstrated that sediments with a higher proportion of fine fraction (<63 m) adsorb more TBT [3,38,39]; however, contrasting results, i.e., showing no correlation, can also be found in the literature [32]. In our study the correlation between TOC and fine fraction (<2 m or <63 m) was not observed; thus, the results obtained do not allow us to evaluate the impact of grain size on TBT persistence in sediments either directly or indirectly through defining the amount of the adsorbed organic matter.…”
Section: Sediment Characteristics As Parameters Controlling Tbt Degramentioning
confidence: 99%