Background: Long-term dietary weight loss results in complex metabolic changes. However, its effect on cholesterol metabolism in obese subjects is still unclear. Objective: We assessed the effects of 2 y of weight loss achieved with various diet regimens on phytosterols (markers of intestinal cholesterol absorption), lanosterol (marker of de novo cholesterol synthesis), and changes in apolipoprotein concentrations. Design: We conducted the 2-y Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DIRECT-a study of low-fat, Mediterranean, and low-carbohydrate diets). We assessed circulating phytosterol and lanosterol concentrations and their ratios to cholesterol and apolipoproteins A-I and B-100 in 90 DIRECT participants at 0, 6, and 24 mo. Results: We observed a significant upregulation of the markers of cholesterol absorption (campesterol: +16.8%, P , 0.001) and a downregulation of the markers of cholesterol synthesis (lanosterol: 216.5%, P = 0.008) during the active weight-loss phase (first 6 mo, weight loss of 5%, 6%, and 10% in the 3 diet groups, respectively), followed by a rebound (campesterol: 26.2%, P = 0.045; lanosterol: +43.7%, P , 0.001) during the next 18 mo (weight gain of 1%, 1%, and 2% in the 3 diet groups, respectively). HDL cholesterol continuously increased during the study (17.0%, P , 0.001), whereas LDL cholesterol remained constant. At the end of the 24-mo followup period, campesterol (P , 0.001) and lanosterol (P = 0.016) amounts were significantly higher than baseline values. The concentration of apolipoprotein B-100 correlated with cholesterol metabolism (q = 0.299 and P = 0.020 for lanosterol;q = 20.105 and NS for campesterol), and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance correlated with lanosterol (q = 0.09, P = 0.001). Conclusions: Long-term weight loss is related to a characteristic response suggestive of altered cholesterol and apolipoprotein metabolism. Various diets have a similar effect on these effects. DIRECT is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00160108.Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:1189-95.