2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline Predictors for One-Year Visual Outcomes with Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Abstract: Objective To determine baseline predictors of visual acuity (VA) outcomes at 1 year after treatment with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design Cohort study within the Comparison of AMD Treatments Trials. Participants 1105 participants with neovascular AMD, baseline VA 20/25 to 20/320, and VA measured at 1 year. Methods Participants were randomly assigned to ranibizumab or bevacizumab on either a monthly or as-needed schedule. Masked readers evaluated fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
229
7
11

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
19
229
7
11
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12 Hypersensitivity to an anti-VEGF or similar product should merit discontinuation of therapy and switch to another product. 7 It has been reported that predictors for poor response at 12 months include: older age, better baseline acuity, larger CNV size, angiographic lesion type, the absence of RAP and the presence of GA, in addition to higher foveal thickness, PED or elevation on OCT. 21 This confirms the earlier reports from Kaiser et al 71 that baseline vision, CNV size and age were important predictors of treatment outcomes with ranibizumab. Higher gain in acuity is often a function of poor starting vision and reflects a ceiling effect of BCVA measurements in n-AMD.…”
Section: Management Of Suboptimal Response To Anti-vegf Therapy In Amdsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,12 Hypersensitivity to an anti-VEGF or similar product should merit discontinuation of therapy and switch to another product. 7 It has been reported that predictors for poor response at 12 months include: older age, better baseline acuity, larger CNV size, angiographic lesion type, the absence of RAP and the presence of GA, in addition to higher foveal thickness, PED or elevation on OCT. 21 This confirms the earlier reports from Kaiser et al 71 that baseline vision, CNV size and age were important predictors of treatment outcomes with ranibizumab. Higher gain in acuity is often a function of poor starting vision and reflects a ceiling effect of BCVA measurements in n-AMD.…”
Section: Management Of Suboptimal Response To Anti-vegf Therapy In Amdsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The degree of change in VA is contingent on the baseline acuity, that is, at the time-point at which treatment is initiated. 16,[19][20][21] It is intuitive to suppose that treatment given when the disease has not caused permanent destruction of the neural and supporting cells will result in best outcomes. Morphological changes precede the loss of visual function.…”
Section: Parameters Used To Assess Response To Anti-vegf Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 To date, the Amsler grid and preferential hyperacuity perimetry (PHP) are two frequently used tests in the diagnostic work-up in clinical practice. 5,6 Besides them, several additional modifications and new tests, such as the shape discrimination hyperacuity test, 7,8 have been proposed, but their diagnostic value has not yet been systematically studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the levels of pretreatment visual acuity and several morphologic parameters in OCT have been assessed in detail as possible predictors for treatment outcome, 23 the role of factors of retinal hemodynamics indicating at a treatment response are ill understood. We are aware of only one study by Barak et al 17 that looked into the short-term effects of bevacizumab (Avastin) on RBFV.…”
Section: Results In Context With the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%