2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.883287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baseline processing pipeline for fast automatic target detection and recognition in airborne 3D ladar imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the aforementioned processing gain due to the platform, the coding differences and the desired this latency, we set an upper processing time limit of 500ms for our developing platform. The literature suggests measuring the computational complexity in seconds [26], [28], [29]. But due to the processing time limit set and the high-speed the missile is flying at, we set the computational complexity on a millisecond basis [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the aforementioned processing gain due to the platform, the coding differences and the desired this latency, we set an upper processing time limit of 500ms for our developing platform. The literature suggests measuring the computational complexity in seconds [26], [28], [29]. But due to the processing time limit set and the high-speed the missile is flying at, we set the computational complexity on a millisecond basis [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only open source military oriented ATR algorithms are based on Spin Images [26], geometric fitting [27], multi-hypothesis sequential testing [28], the Baseline Processing Pipeline [29] and the Projection Density Energy based solution [30]. Although Spin Images perform well in target recognition, their calculation time exceeds the constraints of a LIDAR based missile.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for each c P acting as a centroid, we extract a spherical Figure 5. Despite the effectiveness of a smooth surface filtering scheme, surprisingly, current military literature either does not exploit such a procedure at all [15] or discards only planar ground surfaces [18,23].…”
Section: Smooth Surface Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that literature has not investigated yet how atmospheric disturbances affect ATR tasks. Additionally, opposing to current 3D descriptor evaluations [13,14] or to purely military oriented 3D ATR manuscripts [15][16][17][18] that consider a constant target scale, we investigate the descriptor's performance in various missile-target ranges. It should be noted that, in contrast to current literature that correlates scale with the description radius [14,19] we refer to its distance related meaning that affects the spot size of the laser beam on the scene and forces the scene to have simultaneously a different size and resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have been conducted on this front, among them are filtering algorithms [2][3][4], parametric system identification [5], statistical signal processing [6], subspace methods [7][8][9], entropy-based approaches [10] and techniques employing parametric and non-parametric modeling [11]. A neural networks approach has been introduced in the marine radar application [12] for sea clutter reduction and other approaches have been successfully used in automatic radar detection in ground clutter [13,14]. While each method tackles different aspects of the problem, there is still room for further improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%