2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basement control, sedimentary basin inception and early evolution of the Mesozoic basins in the Patagonian foreland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continued extension, magmatism and the formation of associated hydrothermal systems gave rise to the development of low to intermediate sulfidation epithermal veins which have predominant NW strike (Echeveste, 2010). The distribution and orientation of these coincide with regional geological lineaments of NW and NNW orientation (Guido and Campbell, 2011;Giacosa et al, 2010), which imply reactivation of Lower Paleozoic NNW to NW basement structures (Homovc and Constantini, 2001;Giacosa, 2020). In turn, the effusive facies are associated with ENE and NNW lineaments, showing that the volcanic materials were mostly extruded through the Jurassic extensional fractures, occasionally generating caldera structures (Guido, 2004).…”
Section: Structural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Continued extension, magmatism and the formation of associated hydrothermal systems gave rise to the development of low to intermediate sulfidation epithermal veins which have predominant NW strike (Echeveste, 2010). The distribution and orientation of these coincide with regional geological lineaments of NW and NNW orientation (Guido and Campbell, 2011;Giacosa et al, 2010), which imply reactivation of Lower Paleozoic NNW to NW basement structures (Homovc and Constantini, 2001;Giacosa, 2020). In turn, the effusive facies are associated with ENE and NNW lineaments, showing that the volcanic materials were mostly extruded through the Jurassic extensional fractures, occasionally generating caldera structures (Guido, 2004).…”
Section: Structural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It belongs to an igneous metamorphic belt in the southern margin of the North Patagonian Massif (NPM, Fig. 1) with a NW-SE trend and its tectonic structures have had a strong influence on the geological evolution of central Patagonia (Figari et al, 2015;Bilmes et al, 2013;Echaurren et al, 2016;Zaffarana et al, 2017;Bucher et al, 2019;Renda et al, 2019;Suarez et al, 2019;Ruiz González et al, 2020;Foix et al, 2020;Giacosa et al, 2020;Serra-Varela et al, 2020;Marcos et al, 2020). The metamorphic and plutonic rocks comprising this belt have been grouped, in general, under the medium-high metamorphic grade Cushamen Formation (Volkheimer, 1964) and the plutonic Mamil Choique Formation (Ravazzoli and Sesana, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%