2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic gait and symmetry measures for primary school-aged children and young adults whilst walking barefoot and with shoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

20
125
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
20
125
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the other tests' graphs, the foot rotation graphs were not clear enough. Even though this study was kinematic and did not include children under 5 years old, the difference between adults and children under fi ve years old in ankle kinetics was also mentioned in the literature (15,16). This supports some late maturation of ankle joint movements or moments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with the other tests' graphs, the foot rotation graphs were not clear enough. Even though this study was kinematic and did not include children under 5 years old, the difference between adults and children under fi ve years old in ankle kinetics was also mentioned in the literature (15,16). This supports some late maturation of ankle joint movements or moments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Otherwise, because of the effect of joint kinematics, some statistical differences between equal groups may occur. Many of these results provide that a 7 year old child has similar gait with adults although there are some age maturity differences in gait kinematics (5). There are various factors of maturity of gait patterns, such as the muscle recruitment variability, immature strategies of equilibrium under 7 years old, immature sensory integration, developmental differences of body segments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Gait variables were converted to z-scores based on normative age-matched data. [36][37][38] The p values were then calculated using one sample Student's t-tests (two-tailed). Gait variables of participants aged 16 and 17 were presented as raw data but could not be included in the correlation analysis as there were no GAITRite normative data available for these ages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Etapa atacului cu călcâiul a fost împărţită în două sub-etape: prima reprezentată de un contact foarte scurt al călcâiului, după care articulaţia genunchiului s-a menţinut în extensie, iar cea de a doua reprezentată de contactul extension; another was overall contacting of the heel. Whereas, in child population, Hallemans [1] suggested that gait pattern of heel-strike was found in the age of 1.5 years; but other literatures implied that adult-like length, width and frequency of gait were obtained after the age of 13 [7]. Moreover, Fritz [8] explored the correlation between FW and BW in order to interpret the maturation of the gait.…”
Section: Introducereunclassified