2018
DOI: 10.3390/foods8010003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic In-Mouth Attribute Evaluation: A Comparison of Two Panels

Abstract: Astringency is often difficult to evaluate accurately in wine because of its complexity. This accuracy can improve through training sessions, but it can be time-consuming and expensive. A way to reduce these costs can be the use of wine experts, who are known to be reliable evaluators. Therefore, the aim of this work was to compare the sensory results and the panel performance obtained using trained panelists versus wine experts (winemakers). Judges evaluated twelve red wines for in-mouth basic perception (swe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensory analysis was also performed to establish potential relationships with measured chemical variables. Positive correlations were observed between the two mouthfeel attributes, as previously reported (Mihnea et al, 2018;. Additionally, their mean scores show that astringency scored higher than bitterness across all vintages, which suggests that participants were able to distinguish between these attributes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Sensory analysis was also performed to establish potential relationships with measured chemical variables. Positive correlations were observed between the two mouthfeel attributes, as previously reported (Mihnea et al, 2018;. Additionally, their mean scores show that astringency scored higher than bitterness across all vintages, which suggests that participants were able to distinguish between these attributes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As shown in Fig. 7, the intensity of astringency in our wines correlated with the amount of MCP tannins (R 2 = 0.69) and the concentration of polymeric phenols (R 2 = 0.92), which correlates with similar findings by Mihnea et al (2019) for South African red wines.…”
Section: Sensory Evolution Of 2015 Winessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A panel of nine judges (five male, four female, age span 30–64) evaluated, each year, the wines from this study. These professionals were oenologists and technicians from Galician wineries, with expertise on assessing white wines, because experienced tasters describe better what they like than consumers or trained panelists [24,25]. For this evaluation, we used a scorecard consisting of 21 descriptors (four for color, 10 for aroma, and seven for palate), which were specifically chosen for Galician white wines and were scored from 0 (not present) to 9 (very intense) [26,27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%