Basic life support training: Demonstration versus lecture – A randomised controlled trial

Hansen, Christian K.; Bang, Camilla; Rasmussen, Stinne E; Nebsbjerg, Mette Amalie; Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup; Bomholt, Katrine Bjørnshave; Krogh, Kristian; Løfgren, Bo

doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.008

Cited by 7 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified 86 studies relating to the 9 prespecified topics, 28–113 and the remaining 24 studies did not relate to our prespecified topics of interest (see table, Supplemental Digital Content 4, description of studies not relating to the specified topics, http://links.lww.com/SIH/A741). 114–137 We summarized all existing recommendations by the ERC, AHA, and ILCOR on the CPR training topics covered in this review (Table 1). 20–23 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for Healthcare Professionals

Lauridsen¹,

Løfgren²,

Brogaard³

et al. 2021

Sim Healthcare

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary StatementThe optimal strategy for training cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for healthcare professionals remains to be determined. This scoping review aimed to describe the emerging evidence for CPR training for healthcare professionals.We screened 7605 abstracts and included 110 studies in this scoping review on CPR training for healthcare professionals. We assessed the included articles for evidence for the following topics: training duration, retraining intervals, e-learning, virtual reality/augmented reality/gamified learning, instructor-learner ratio, equipment and manikins, other aspects of contextual learning content, feedback devices, and feedback/debriefing. We found emerging evidence supporting the use of low-dose, high-frequency training with e-learning to achieve knowledge, feedback devices to perform high-quality chest compressions, and in situ team simulations with debriefings to improve the performance of provider teams.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for Healthcare Professionals

Lauridsen¹,

Løfgren²,

Brogaard³

et al. 2021

Sim Healthcare

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many suggested interactive teaching sessions for vaccine education, such as role play and simulated patients. Studies have shown that practical teaching is more effective than lectures in facilitating the learning process and improving knowledge outputs [20,[50][51][52]. In one needs-assessment study, students enjoyed learning from flipped classroom and case-based formats, and felt more confident in their approach towards vaccine-related discussions [53].…”

Section: Student-suggested Improvementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Needs-Based Analysis of Teaching on Vaccinations and COVID-19 in German Medical Schools

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need for improving public confidence in vaccines. Academic gaps and redundancies on vaccinations must be identified to revise the medical curriculum for up-to-date training of medical students. This cross-sectional survey assessed the status of vaccine-related teaching in general and specific to COVID-19 in medical schools across Germany. A total of 4,313 medical students completed a questionnaire comprising items on national learning goals and perceived needs for teaching on vaccinations. Mixed methods were used to analyse data quantitatively for relative frequencies (%) and correlations between teaching items and semesters (Spearman’s rho), and qualitatively (content analysis). Our findings showed that 38.92% of the students were dissatisfied with teaching on vaccine-preventable diseases, but the perceived satisfaction increased in later semesters (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). Moreover, 75.84% and 68.15% of the students were dissatisfied with teaching related to vaccine scepticism and vaccine-related communication strategies, respectively. Furthermore, 63.79% reported dissatisfaction with teaching on COVID-19 disease and 72.93% with teaching on COVID-19 vaccines. A total of 79.12% stated they educated others on COVID-19 and its vaccines and 75.14% felt responsible to do so. A majority of the medical students were dissatisfied with teaching on dealing with vaccine scepticism, communication strategies and COVID-19 vaccines. We recommend practice-oriented vaccine education, especially for teaching communication skills to medical students.

show abstract

“…Study characteristics, designs, and main outcomes are described in Table 1 . Fourteen studies were RCTs, 12 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 and 3 non-RCTs 34 , 35 , 36 with a total number of 2,906 participants. Publication dates ranged from 2010 to 2022 (with data acquisition between 2004 and 2020).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fourteen studies (82%) were undertaken in Europe, and the studies analyzed nine different skills related to resuscitation. Fourteen studies 12 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 reported short term outcomes (up to less than 3 months), while five studies 23 , 27 , 31 , 32 , 35 reported mid- to long-term retention (from 3 months up to 6 months post training). We found a wide range of target populations with 15 studies investigating various groups of healthcare professionals, 12 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 and two studies investigating lay persons 26 , 27 ( Table 1 , Table 2 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Peyton’s four-step approach to teach skills is applied in the standard course formats of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), 10 the Australian Resuscitation Council, and various National Resuscitation Councils in Europe while the American Heart Association does not use the approach. However, it is not clear in the literature whether a four-step approach to teach skills is superior to such modifications as using less than four steps, or substituting single steps by e.g., video 11 or lecture 12 or to no sequencing at all. 13 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stepwise approach to skills teaching in resuscitation: A systematic review

Breckwoldt,

Cheng,

Lauridsen

et al. 2023

Resuscitation Plus

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Basic life support training: Demonstration versus lecture – A randomised controlled trial

Cited by 7 publications

References 22 publications

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for Healthcare Professionals

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training for Healthcare Professionals

A Needs-Based Analysis of Teaching on Vaccinations and COVID-19 in German Medical Schools

Stepwise approach to skills teaching in resuscitation: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About