2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basic mathematical programming models for capacity allocation in mesh-based survivable networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The integer linear programming (ILP) approach has been surveyed by Kennington et al [6], but this only works well for small problems with linear objective functions and constraints [3]. The limitations of ILP models have led to the introduction of diverse heuristic algorithms.…”
Section: Survivability In Optical Mesh Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The integer linear programming (ILP) approach has been surveyed by Kennington et al [6], but this only works well for small problems with linear objective functions and constraints [3]. The limitations of ILP models have led to the introduction of diverse heuristic algorithms.…”
Section: Survivability In Optical Mesh Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GA population size was 50 for 40 generations with crossover probability of 0.9 and mutation probability of 0.01. The demand matrix used was D ¼ [ (1,11,10); (2,7,6); (3,4,7); (6,4,5); (5,17,8); (6,11,9); (17,10,6); (11,4,11); (13,8,13) …”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the distributed networking the program or tasks are also often developed with the subsets of independent units under distributed environments. Some of the task allocation methods have been reported in the literature, such as Integer Programming [6,8], Branch and Bound technique [3], Load Balancing [1,2], Reliability Optimization [11,4], and M odeling [5]. It has seen that this concept is cost-effective and reliable to meet the optimal solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key advantage of pre-configured protection cycles, or p-cycles for short, lies in their switching speed and simplicity, similar to ring networks, as the protection paths around the surviving portions of the cycle are pre-connected at the outset and the only required switching actions take place at the end nodes of the failure. In spite of many existing studies on protection/restoration schemes (Kennington et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2002;Zhang & Mukherjee, 2004) and although it is known that p-cycles are less capacity efficient, there has been no systematic analysis of how much bandwidth p-cycles schemes require in comparison with the basic shared link and path protection. Due to the highly combinatorial nature of p-cycle designs, nearly all studies are based on an explicit enumeration of cycles, resulting in difficulties for assessing the quality of the solutions provided by the resulting huge ILP models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%