Basic Properties of Reference Crossply Carbon-Fiber Composite

Corum, J.M.

doi:10.2172/777662

Cited by 26 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(5) is in evaluating damage progress of cross-ply (0/90) FRP composite laminates, as predicted results showed good agreement with experimental data reported in the literature [16][17][18][19]. The employed factor η of 10-20% was found to be in good agreement with experimental results of (0/90) laminates reported in references [17] and [20].…”

Section: Fatigue Damage Analysis For (0/θ) Frp Composite Laminate Syssupporting

confidence: 79%

“…Over 145 experimentally obtained uniaxial fatigue damage data of (0/90) CFRP and GRP composites by Wharmby et al [16], Daniel et al [17], Corum et al [18], and Boniface and Ogin [19] were evaluated in a recent study by the present authors [9].…”

Section: Cross-ply (0/90) Composite Laminatesmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…To evaluate the capability of the proposed damage model in assessing fatigue damage of (0/90) GRP and CFRP composite laminates at various R-ratios and cyclic stress amplitudes, a few series of (0/90) experimental fatigue damage data have been extracted from the literature [17][18][19]. Over 145 experimentally obtained uniaxial fatigue damage data of (0/90) CFRP and GRP composites by Wharmby et al [16], Daniel et al [17], Corum et al [18], and Boniface and Ogin [19] were evaluated in a recent study by the present authors [9].…”

Section: Cross-ply (0/90) Composite Laminatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…5. Figures 6b and 6d respectively represent fatigue damage data of CFRP composite specimens with a fiber volume fractions of V f =42.7% [18] tested at the stress amplitude of 424.8 MPa and R=0.1 and CFRP specimens with V f =63% [17] tested at the stress amplitude of 662 MPa and R=0 plotted versus the predicted damage results. In Figs.…”

Section: Cross-ply (0/90) Composite Laminatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Stiffness Degradation Based Fatigue Damage Model for FRP Composites of (0/θ) Laminate Systems

Shirazi

Varvani‐Farahani

2009

Appl Compos Mater

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study develops a stiffness reduction-based model to characterize fatigue damage in unidirectional 0˚and θ°plies and (0/θ) laminates of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites. The proposed damage model was constructed based on (i) cracking mechanism and damage progress in matrix (Region I), matrix-fiber interface (Region II) and fiber (Region III) and (ii) corresponding stiffness reduction of unidirectional composite laminates as the number of cycles progresses. The proposed model enabled damage assessment of FRP (0/θ) composite laminates by integrating the fatigue damage values of 0˚and θ°plies. A weighting factor η was introduced to partition the efficiency of load carrying plies of 0°and θ°in the (0/θ) composite lamina. The fatigue damage curves of unidirectional FRP composite samples with off-axis angles of 0˚, 30˚, 45˚, and 90˚and composite laminate systems of (0˚/30˚), (0˚/45˚) and (0˚/90˚) predicted based on the proposed damage model were found in good agreement with experimental data reported at various cyclic stress levels and stress ratios in the literature.

show abstract

Section: Fatigue Damage Analysis For (0/θ) Frp Composite Laminate Syssupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Cross-ply (0/90) Composite Laminatesmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Cross-ply (0/90) Composite Laminatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cross-ply (0/90) Composite Laminatesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Stiffness Degradation Based Fatigue Damage Model for FRP Composites of (0/θ) Laminate Systems

Shirazi

Varvani‐Farahani

2009

Appl Compos Mater

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…9,[18][19][20] A comprehensive listing of material properties was also published. 21 This material is reinforced by continuous fiber strands and injected very rapidly with the urethane resin. The rapidity of the injection process may cause nonuniform distribution and incomplete penetration of the resin phase.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%