Basic radiological studies contamination control experiments

Abstract

This book wall I:)nllNu'edali in account of work sponsored by en a_iency of the United States Goverrtment. NeitP_erthe United $tatu Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employeeS, rr_kes any werrsrtty, exlocess or imDlied, or assumes any legal iilbility or rt_:onsibi_ity for the eccurecy, completeness, or usefulnus of any _nform_tion, OPl_ratul, product or f_roceu discJosed, or re_rwents Chatits us_ wouJd ., t_ot infringe DrivateiV own_ rightS. Refer_c_ herein to any sl:mcific commercial 13roduct, prooNI, or service by trodo name, trade,irk, rrtanufecturer, or otherwise, ¢IOU not _'i_Y constitute or im_y its ec_d_t, recommendation, or favoring by the United Stlltos Government 04' any ag_c_ thereof. The views snd ol;)inions of " authors exl:)mued herein do not necemmrily state or reflect those of the United StaNm Goverrtr_mt or orty sgency thereof.

100 Area excavation treatability test plan. Revision 1

“…Bench-scale tests conducted at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory showed that chemical dust suppressants are effective for controlling dast spread (Winberg and Wixom 1992, Duce et al 1989, and Duce et al 1988. Chelnical dust suppressants, or crusting agents, may produce a tough surface without the need for repeated application" therefore, they will be tested tor applicability in the 100 Area for inactive areas.…”

100 area excavation treatability test plan

“…Bench-scale tests conducted at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory showed that chemical dust suppressants are effective for controlling dust spread (Winberg and ' Wixom 1992;Duce et al 1989;and Duce et al 1988). Chemical dust suppressants, or crusting agents, may produce a tough surface without the need for repeated application; therefore, they will be testt:d for applicability in the 100 Area for inactive areas.…”