2011
DOI: 10.1206/0003-0090-363.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basicranial Morphology and Relationships of Antillean Heptaxodontidae (Rodentia, Ctenohystrica, Caviomorpha)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the presence of this shelf (anular bridge) has nothing to do with the occurrence of an entotympanic, nor does it represent yet another novel element (a separately ossified "anulus membrane"). its form and width are simply a function of the amount of remodeling activity occurring in the subtympanic recess, as has been documented for various primates and rodents in which a similar feature occurs (macPhee and cartmill, 1986;macPhee, 2011). in summary, the symmetrical, parasagittal grooves on the bullar floors of Cochilius volvens Amnh-VP 29651 can be plausibly interpreted as marking the position of an ectotympano-entotympanic suture in this taxon.…”
Section: Entotympanic Presence In Other Notoungulatesmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the presence of this shelf (anular bridge) has nothing to do with the occurrence of an entotympanic, nor does it represent yet another novel element (a separately ossified "anulus membrane"). its form and width are simply a function of the amount of remodeling activity occurring in the subtympanic recess, as has been documented for various primates and rodents in which a similar feature occurs (macPhee and cartmill, 1986;macPhee, 2011). in summary, the symmetrical, parasagittal grooves on the bullar floors of Cochilius volvens Amnh-VP 29651 can be plausibly interpreted as marking the position of an ectotympano-entotympanic suture in this taxon.…”
Section: Entotympanic Presence In Other Notoungulatesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…(5) Although it cannot be argued that otic characters have a privileged status when it comes to defining monophyletic groups, experience with various mammalian clades teaches that, more often than not, they can be very helpful in this regard (macPhee, 2011). Thus, Billet and de muizon (2013) have recently shown that a suite of apparently derived features of notoungulata (bean-shaped promontorium, a laterally located tensor tympani fossa, and merged stapedial fossa and postpromontorial tympanic sinus) can be used to conclusively attribute isolated petrosals whose affinities were previously uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subtype 2 of multiserial HSBs [30]). Because of their 'multi-lamellar' cheek tooth organization, the systematics of these two Caribbean taxa (as well as that of Quemisia from Hispaniola, Clidomys and Xaymaca from Jamaica, and Tainotherium from Puerto Rico, all from Pleistocene-Holocene contexts [53,[61][62][63][64]) has long been the subject of controversy (chinchilloids versus cavioids versus octodontoids [16]). Based on characters of the ear region anatomy, MacPhee [16] underlined that Amblyrhiza shares several derived features with chinchilloids (close to chinchillids and dinomyids), whereas Elasmodontomys displays a primitive basicranial morphology, which does not allow for a precise supra-familial assignment (?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most island systems have experienced high levels of humancaused biodiversity loss (6), and many unusual insular taxa are now extinct and represented only by incomplete subfossil remains. In the absence of molecular analyses, such taxa can remain evolutionarily enigmatic, often with multiple competing noncongruent phylogenetic hypotheses derived from restricted morphological datasets (10,11). Improved molecular sampling of extinct taxa is necessary to resolve these conflicts and reconstruct the evolution of insular biotas through time, and distinguish between morphologies representing adaptive responses to island environments versus those representing "primitive" traits lost from continental representatives of diversifying clades.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%