“…However, internal sequence stratigraphic frameworks vary greatly between workers (Figure ). The majority of studies have focused on the proximal parts of the formation (Davies et al , ; Markhasin, ; Moslow and Davies, ; Kendall, ; Moslow, ; Panek, ), isolated to localized spatial areas (Evoy and Moslow, ; Evoy, ; Harris, ; Dixon, ; ; ; ; Golding et al , ; Moslow et al , ; Proverbs et al , ; Zonneveld and Moslow, ) or isolated stratigraphic intervals (Euzen et al , ; Prenoslo et al , ), with only a few studies looking at sequence stratigraphic correlations on a larger, basin‐wide scale (Crombez et al , ; ; Davies and Humes, ; Davies et al , ). Although the scope of each publication differs, no unanimous sequence stratigraphic framework has emerged for the Lower and Middle Triassic, and the sequence stratigraphic surfaces identified are varied (Figure ).…”