2007
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basis function cross‐correlations for Robust k‐space sample density compensation, with application to the design of radiofrequency excitations

Abstract: The problem of k -space sample density compensation is restated as the normalization of the independent information that can be expressed by the ensemble of Fourier basis functions corresponding to the trajectory. Specifically, multiple samples (complex exponential functions) may be contributing to each independent information element (independent basis function). Normalization can be accomplished by solving a linear system based on the cross-correlation matrix of the underlying Fourier basis functions. The so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is a matrix of cross-correlation values which determines a linear system whose solution gives the desired density compensation. As we describe in more detail below, this matrix gives the normal equations for the overdetermined linear system presented in [5], modulo the difference between direct sampling of the Fourier functions as in [5] compared to analytically computing the matrix elements as in [4]. More importantly, unlike the direct linear system in [5] where the final image must be known (as is the case for the problem of radio-frequency (RF) excitation design), the normal equations can also be solved for the problem of image reconstruction from acquired samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result is a matrix of cross-correlation values which determines a linear system whose solution gives the desired density compensation. As we describe in more detail below, this matrix gives the normal equations for the overdetermined linear system presented in [5], modulo the difference between direct sampling of the Fourier functions as in [5] compared to analytically computing the matrix elements as in [4]. More importantly, unlike the direct linear system in [5] where the final image must be known (as is the case for the problem of radio-frequency (RF) excitation design), the normal equations can also be solved for the problem of image reconstruction from acquired samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group recently presented a new algorithm [4] that has potential application for several aspects of imaging with spiral trajectories. This algorithm, presented in the context of density compensation, projects, or cross-correlates the spiral samples onto the underlying Fourier basis vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since then, a steadily growing number of applications for 2D‐selective pulses have been reported, facilitated by advances in gradient hardware and the demand for fast imaging. Recently, the use of self‐refocused 2D‐selective RF pulses that account for T 2 *‐dependent relaxation during the excitation has been reported for sharper FOV localization and better outer‐volume suppression (2, 11–16). Although the theoretical aspects of these strategies show a potential for removing the need for refocusing gradients, and thereby shortening the minimum TE, practical implementations have only been demonstrated in phantoms (11, 15), at low field strength (1, 14, 17), and for imaging stationary or slow‐moving organs (1–3, 13, 14, 17, 18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of MR image reconstruction from k-space samples arranged on non-Cartesian grids has been extensively studied in the past two decades (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20). The essence of this problem is that the samples collected do not provide independent information about the imaged object within the confines of the desired field-of-view (FOV) (20). That is, direct expansion of the collected coefficients using the encoding basis (i.e., complex exponential Fourier basis functions) produces a reconstructed object that possesses a different Fourier coefficient spectrum than that observed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%