2015
DOI: 10.1134/s0031030115140087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Basis of ontogenetic and evolutionary transformations of thecate hydroids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the objects was determined based on the accessibility of the samples, the presentation of different colony types (stolonial vs. shoot-forming), and the different modes of shoot growth (sympodial-monopodial). One species with thinner and softer perisarc belongs to the order Anthoathecata (athecate hydroid with a stolonial colony), while two other species are representatives of the order Leptothecata (thecate hydroids with shoot-forming colonies and a different mode of shoot growth) and have a well-developed and rigid perisarc (Marfenin and Kosevich, 2004 ; Kosevich, 2012 , 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the objects was determined based on the accessibility of the samples, the presentation of different colony types (stolonial vs. shoot-forming), and the different modes of shoot growth (sympodial-monopodial). One species with thinner and softer perisarc belongs to the order Anthoathecata (athecate hydroid with a stolonial colony), while two other species are representatives of the order Leptothecata (thecate hydroids with shoot-forming colonies and a different mode of shoot growth) and have a well-developed and rigid perisarc (Marfenin and Kosevich, 2004 ; Kosevich, 2012 , 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%