2018
DOI: 10.3375/043.038.0208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bat Activity Following Restoration Prescribed Burning in the Central Appalachian Upland and Riparian Habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative bat activity levels of WNS-affected species, while not a focal point of this study, have been documented as currently very low in the central Appalachians (Austin et al 2018) and other WNS-affected areas (Brooks 2011;Dzal et al 2011;Ford et al 2011;Jachowski et al 2014). Population declines are known to have occurred because of WNS (Reynolds et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative bat activity levels of WNS-affected species, while not a focal point of this study, have been documented as currently very low in the central Appalachians (Austin et al 2018) and other WNS-affected areas (Brooks 2011;Dzal et al 2011;Ford et al 2011;Jachowski et al 2014). Population declines are known to have occurred because of WNS (Reynolds et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Although there are increasing numbers of prescribed burns in the central Appalachians (Brose et al 2011), it is a small percentage annually (\ 5%) of public lands overall (USDA Forest Service 2014; Young et al 2017), and the limited history of prescribed fire precludes assessment of the long-term impacts of fire. Historic wildfires, although variable in intensity and size than prescribed fires on nearby national forest or state lands (Austin et al 2018), offer a pragmatic surrogate to assess long-term burn impacts on bats that can be used to better incorporate both bat and fire ecology into land management plans. Our objectives, therefore, were to assess patterns of site occupancy by bat species among variously aged burned stands and paired unburned stands in the central Appalachians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low correlation between edge-adapted foraging strategy and fire and forest structure variables ( Figure 4) was likely due to variation in individual species' relationships to fire regime and forest structure variables ( Figure 2). Previous studies of M. lucifugus and E. fuscus reported no effect of fire on activity (Austin, Silvis, Ford, Muthersbaugh, & Powers, 2018;Loeb & Waldrop, 2008;Silvis, Gehrt, & Williams, 2016), but that work focused on prescribed fire, which likely burned at relatively lower severity than much of the wildfire that occurred within our study area. The positive association between M. lucifugus occupancy and recent fires may be influenced by the species' preference for aquatic prey, as pulses in aquatic productivity can be stimulated by fire (Malison & Baxter, 2010;Roby & Azuma, 1995).…”
Section: Relationships Between Fire and Individual Species Occupancymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Similarly, a previous study in southern Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests found higher activity rates of small-bodied species within high-severity areas 8 , and a study in Idaho forests found that overall bat activity was higher in high-severity areas than unburned areas 43 . Studies of prescribed fires that mimic low- to moderate-severity wildfire have shown slightly positive to neutral response of bat species or groups 42,44,45 . Our results showing positive relationships between occupancy and burn severity for many species may indicate that foraging and/or commuting rates are increased by wildfire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%