2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0444-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bat richness and activity in heterogeneous landscapes: guild-specific and scale-dependent?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
33
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
7
33
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study had some limitations and potential shortcomings, but we believe that they did not affect our key results in any significant way. First, although our sample size was relatively small, the number of transects surveyed was comparable to that of similar studies (e.g., Davy, Russo, & Fenton, ; Mendes, Fonseca, Marques, Maia, & Ramos Pereira, ; Rainho, ; Salvarina et al., ; Vaughan et al., ), and it was sufficient to detect 19 of the 25 bat species occurring in continental Portugal. Therefore, it is unlikely that small sample sizes were responsible for the strong associations observed with water bodies and riparian habitats, or the marked variations in the spatial distribution of species richness and bat activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Our study had some limitations and potential shortcomings, but we believe that they did not affect our key results in any significant way. First, although our sample size was relatively small, the number of transects surveyed was comparable to that of similar studies (e.g., Davy, Russo, & Fenton, ; Mendes, Fonseca, Marques, Maia, & Ramos Pereira, ; Rainho, ; Salvarina et al., ; Vaughan et al., ), and it was sufficient to detect 19 of the 25 bat species occurring in continental Portugal. Therefore, it is unlikely that small sample sizes were responsible for the strong associations observed with water bodies and riparian habitats, or the marked variations in the spatial distribution of species richness and bat activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…, Mendes et al. ). We did not sample in more remote areas of the boreal forest, but our results suggest that little brown bats likely find areas without any human development, and far from rural villages, suitable habitat providing that adequate roosting sites are available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies have shown landscape-level change to be significant for bats (Threlfall et al 2012a, Bender et al 2015, Gehrt and Chelsvig (2003) also found that localized habitat features were more important than landscape effects in predicting responses to urbanization. The importance of local versus landscape-scale habitat characteristics likely varies depending on bat species and region (Walsh and Harris 1996, Johnson et al 2008, Chambers et al 2016, Mendes et al 2017). We did not sample in more remote areas of the boreal forest, but our results suggest that little brown bats likely find areas without any human development, and far from rural villages, suitable habitat providing that adequate roosting sites are available.…”
Section: Influence Of Landscape-scale Variables On Bat Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proportion of builtup area was measured using circular buffers at four radii (100m, 200m, 500m and 1000m) from the centre of each site, to account for the possibility that different bats respond to the landscape at different scales. Radii larger than 1000m were not investigated to avoid overlap between buffers of adjacent sites [ 40 42 ]. Overlapping buffers leads to statistical non-independence of observations as the same predictor values are used multiple times in the data set [ 41 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%