2012
DOI: 10.1121/1.4742752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bat wing air pressures may deflect prey structures to provide echo cues for detecting prey in clutter

Abstract: Bats have remarkable echolocation capabilities to detect prey in darkness. While it is clear how bats do this for prey that is isolated, moving, or noisy, their ability to find still and quiet prey within clutter has remained a mystery. A video published by the ChiRoPing group shows the gleaning bat Micronycteris microtis capturing a still dragonfly specimen sitting on a leaf surface. While hovering over the dragonfly, the bat's wings exert air forces that cause the dragonfly wings to deflect in synchrony with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the hypothesis that a terminal phase seems to be only of particular importance for tracking moving prey [50]. Just recently it has been proposed that prey perception by M. microtis could be facilitated by air turbulences produced by bat wing air forces during hovering flights through slight, induced vibrations of prey body parts [51]. Although we cannot exclude this possibility, from our results this seems unlikely, because M. microtis readily detected prey items lacking potentially vibrating body parts such as wings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This supports the hypothesis that a terminal phase seems to be only of particular importance for tracking moving prey [50]. Just recently it has been proposed that prey perception by M. microtis could be facilitated by air turbulences produced by bat wing air forces during hovering flights through slight, induced vibrations of prey body parts [51]. Although we cannot exclude this possibility, from our results this seems unlikely, because M. microtis readily detected prey items lacking potentially vibrating body parts such as wings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…moving prey [50]. Just recently it has been proposed that prey perception by M. microtis could be facilitated by air turbulences produced by bat wing air forces during hovering flights through slight, induced vibrations of prey body parts [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biosonar system of bats is exceptionally sensitive of preys with motions from large to tiny movement, allowing effectively foraging in cluttered environments. Large motions can provide cues with obvious Doppler frequency modulation; however, some species of bats (e.g., the common big-eared bat, Micronycteris microtis) have been demonstrated with outstanding capability of micromotion perception in clutter related to informative phase variations, suggesting the neural processing mechanism is just beginning to be understood [6,7,9,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gleaning Myotis use short frequency-modulated (FM) broadband calls, but behavioural evidence demonstrates these bats are less efficient at this task when background ‘clutter’ obscures target echoes ( Arlettaz et al, 2001 ). Some substrate gleaners may beat their wings at potential prey to elicit movement ( Kuc and Kuc, 2012 ). True active gleaning requires the bat to distinguish a motionless target from its resting surface, which can be a highly structured background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%