Blood Red Roses 2007
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1cd0nw1.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Battle-related trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 24 injuries, 58.34% of the injuries are found on the cranium and mandible, and 41.66% are found on postcranial skeleton. This high percentage of cranial trauma was also observed in other samples: in Royal Church from Oslo, 24.8% of the male skeletons from the cemetery have perimortem cranial injuries (Brødholt & Holck, ); in the Sandbjerg skeletal collection, 90% of the skulls have perimortem traumatic injuries (Bennike, ); in the Wisby assemblage, about 40% of skulls have cutmarks (Ingelmark, ); in the Niesulice skeletons, there are two skulls with six perimortem injuries (Dziedzic et al ., ); in the Turin collection, there are six skulls with 15 injuries (Giuffra et al ., ); at Čepin, the males skulls have 36% injuries (Šlaus et al ., ); at the Townton battle site, 72.4% of perimortem cranial wounds were recorded (Novak, ); in Uppsala samples, there are 89.3% perimortem cranial wounds (Kjellström, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the 24 injuries, 58.34% of the injuries are found on the cranium and mandible, and 41.66% are found on postcranial skeleton. This high percentage of cranial trauma was also observed in other samples: in Royal Church from Oslo, 24.8% of the male skeletons from the cemetery have perimortem cranial injuries (Brødholt & Holck, ); in the Sandbjerg skeletal collection, 90% of the skulls have perimortem traumatic injuries (Bennike, ); in the Wisby assemblage, about 40% of skulls have cutmarks (Ingelmark, ); in the Niesulice skeletons, there are two skulls with six perimortem injuries (Dziedzic et al ., ); in the Turin collection, there are six skulls with 15 injuries (Giuffra et al ., ); at Čepin, the males skulls have 36% injuries (Šlaus et al ., ); at the Townton battle site, 72.4% of perimortem cranial wounds were recorded (Novak, ); in Uppsala samples, there are 89.3% perimortem cranial wounds (Kjellström, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injuries are produced by a mix of objects as indicated by the presence of sharp, pointed and blunt force trauma. In other samples, the men from Royal Church (Oslo) had majority of post‐cranial lesions on the tibiae (Brødholt & Holck, ); in the Wisby sample, the percentage is about 60% for post‐cranial lesions (Ingelmark, ); at Sandbjerg, there are 63 lesions on the post‐cranial bones (Bennike, ); in 70 men from Čepin, 16 post‐cranial injuries were observed mainly on tibiae (Šlaus et al ., ); in Townton, most of the wounds are located on the arms/hands and were caused by a sharp force (Novak, ); and in the Uppsala collection, there are only 11 post‐cranial wounds recorded (Kjellström, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Linduff & Rubinson, ). Many of these individuals, such as the soldiers killed at the Battle of Towton (England, 1461 AD) (Novak, ), could certainly be considered IRs. However, without this very unique battlefield context, the social identification of individuals with multiple injuries must be carefully made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that these were battle‐related injuries. But, research into medieval war graves depicts a much different injury pattern, with the head being the main target (Novak, ). While in many of these studies the individuals were not of very high status, the injuries found on the skeleton of Richard III and individuals buried in the Oslo cathedral suggest that those of high status were not exempt from serious injuries during battle or its aftermath, even with the apparent protection of armour (Appleby et al ., In press; Brødholt & Holck, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%