2018
DOI: 10.3150/16-bej897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Baxter’s inequality for finite predictor coefficients of multivariate long-memory stationary processes

Abstract: For a multivariate stationary process, we develop explicit representations for the finite predictor coefficient matrices, the finite prediction error covariance matrices and the partial autocorrelation function (PACF) in terms of the Fourier coefficients of its phase function in the spectral domain. The derivation is based on a novel alternating projection technique and the use of the forward and backward innovations corresponding to predictions based on the infinite past and future, respectively. We show that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of the closed-form expression for φ n,j is long. One important ingredient of the proof is the explicit representation of φ n,j (see the proof of Theorem 6 in D below), which was obtained recently in Inoue et al [11], extending the earlier univariate result in Inoue and Kasahara [8]; see also Inoue et al [10] and Inoue and Kasahara [9] for related work. To explain another important ingredient of the proof of the closed-form expression for φ n,j , we recall that, for h : T → C d×d satisfying (1) and (2), there exists h ♯ : T → C d×d that satisfies (2) and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof of the closed-form expression for φ n,j is long. One important ingredient of the proof is the explicit representation of φ n,j (see the proof of Theorem 6 in D below), which was obtained recently in Inoue et al [11], extending the earlier univariate result in Inoue and Kasahara [8]; see also Inoue et al [10] and Inoue and Kasahara [9] for related work. To explain another important ingredient of the proof of the closed-form expression for φ n,j , we recall that, for h : T → C d×d satisfying (1) and (2), there exists h ♯ : T → C d×d that satisfies (2) and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The representation in [11] holds both for long and short memory processes, and has several applications such as the proof of Baxter's inequality for multivariate long-memory processes in [11]. The representation of φ n,j in [11] is, however, not a closedform expression since it involves infinite series. In this paper, for multivariate ARMA processes, we transform the representation in [11] to a closed-form expression for φ n,j .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since Hu**Hfrakturu*=PMfrakturuQMu*|HscriptV2, by von Neumann's alternating projections, true(Hfrakturu**Hu*true)n converges to the orthogonal projection onto their intersection uKV2HV2 as n. Henceforth, when hLhR is rigid, it follows from uKV2HV2=false{0false} that 0trueI=k=0Tu-0.16emHfrakturu*HukTfrakturu*.In fact, when hLhR is rigid, znuKV2HV2 coincides with the space of scriptV‐valued polynomials with degree less than n for n=0,1,2, and analogous projection formulas can be used for studying MOPUC, as in the authors' earlier work ; see also Inoue–Kasahara–Pourahmadi for applications to prediction problems.…”
Section: Proof and Relevant Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, when ℎ ℎ is rigid, 2 ∩ 2 coincides with the space of -valued polynomials with degree less than for = 0, 1, 2 …, and analogous projection formulas can be used for studying MOPUC, as in the authors' earlier work [13]; see also Inoue-Kasahara-Pourahmadi [12] for applications to prediction problems.…”
Section: Wiener's Lemma a Function In ℳ Is Invertible Therein If It mentioning
confidence: 91%